Steffen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sadly, I cannot reply there (hmmm. is this
> restricion really necessary? aren't we cutting out
> too many people?)
As a member of the LSC, I may be biased, but it is my belief that the official LSC discussion forum should indeed be read-only. The point of the LSC (as far as I know) is to have a committee that's large enough to avoid really stupid decisions made but small enough to actually get decisions made.
This isn't to say that we ignore outside discussion, just that official discussions in that forum should be restricted to LSC members.
-------------------------------------------------------
> sadly, I cannot reply there (hmmm. is this
> restricion really necessary? aren't we cutting out
> too many people?)
As a member of the LSC, I may be biased, but it is my belief that the official LSC discussion forum should indeed be read-only. The point of the LSC (as far as I know) is to have a committee that's large enough to avoid really stupid decisions made but small enough to actually get decisions made.
This isn't to say that we ignore outside discussion, just that official discussions in that forum should be restricted to LSC members.