This whole talk gave me craziest idea of doing something using the variable stuff from LDPE and a new meta command.
How I imagine this.
We set up the motor part to describe it using the variable for the axlehole position. Then, we have this new meta command I came up with: let it be, for example, "0 SETSTATE"
You use this meta command before the part, and then, let's say, you need to turn axlehole 45 degrees, so you set that meta command to be "0 SETSTATE 0.7854".
Crazy and breaks with backwards compatibility? Yes. But could it be implemented for, for example, software like LDCad? I thing that answer is also yes
(Please sorry me if there's already some thing like this and I just missed the whole point of conversation, english isn't quite the thing I'm best at)
How I imagine this.
We set up the motor part to describe it using the variable for the axlehole position. Then, we have this new meta command I came up with: let it be, for example, "0 SETSTATE"
You use this meta command before the part, and then, let's say, you need to turn axlehole 45 degrees, so you set that meta command to be "0 SETSTATE 0.7854".
Crazy and breaks with backwards compatibility? Yes. But could it be implemented for, for example, software like LDCad? I thing that answer is also yes
(Please sorry me if there's already some thing like this and I just missed the whole point of conversation, english isn't quite the thing I'm best at)