Proposal: New !DATA meta-command for embedded textures


RE: Proposal: New !DATA meta-command for embedded textures
#17
(2020-01-17, 3:02)Travis Cobbs Wrote: So, what we need to do is specify that !DATA entries behave just like MPD FILE entries for binary data, but are not otherwise related.
Yes, but they are related though, I would even call the !DATA meta an mpd extension if we go this route.

Because a !DATA will end the current FILE block if any. It could also be the first subfile in the mpd (unless we mandate it can't).


(2020-01-17, 3:02)Travis Cobbs Wrote: Aren't MPD files supposed to begin with 0 FILE?
They do.

And this is another argument for !DATA being an MPD extension, because there needs to be at least one FILE block along side the !DATA one to have a meaningful model.

Although you could have a ldr with just the !DATA block and reference that from another ldr (just like an mpd with only one FILE block), but that seems a bit wasteful Smile
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Proposal: New !DATA meta-command for embedded textures - by Roland Melkert - 2020-01-17, 19:51

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)