Proposal: New !DATA meta-command for embedded textures


RE: Proposal: New !DATA meta-command for embedded textures
#9
(2020-01-15, 2:09)Travis Cobbs Wrote: Unless I'm misunderstanding, I think your are suggesting we go with my original proposal. Since you were the one to suggest using MPD submodels in the first place I want to make sure you haven't forgotten your original reasoning.

I was trying to make it an hybrid.

With !DATA acting like FILE non supporting editors will ignore it all, and supporting ones could hide those subfiles and/or give give them special treatment while reusing the search mechanism already in place for the FILE meta.

Side note, should we include the mime type of the encoded data? "image/png" being the only one officially supported from the get go? 

I can imagine adding more stuff to mpd's (e.g. LDCad scripts Blush  )
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Proposal: New !DATA meta-command for embedded textures - by Roland Melkert - 2020-01-15, 19:11

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)