Posts: 303
Threads: 32
Joined: Jul 2011
RE: What requires a HOLD vote on the Parts Tracker
2019-06-28, 8:12
(2019-06-25, 8:14)Willy Tschager Wrote: [*]
0 BFC CERTIFY INVERTNEXT
w.
There's a separate entry in the issue list for "CERTIFY INVERTNEXT".
(2019-06-25, 8:21)Willy Tschager Wrote: [*][*]
It should trigger a warning because of readability. If this text would end up in just one line it get's harder reading it
w.
I guess that makes sense since it reads so in the spec...
(2019-06-26, 18:16)Travis Cobbs Wrote: [*][*][*]
Just to clarify, I don't feel that T-junctions should trigger a hold. However, I do feel that every effort should be made to avoid them (even in the example given).
In any case I don't think that I'm going to implement automatic T-junction detection since it seems to vary case-by-case whether it's a problem or not.
(2019-06-27, 6:46)Willy Tschager Wrote: [*][*][*][*]
Teemu,
any idea how this can be integrate into ldraw.org o is a link in the PT Tools enough?
w.
I understood that the idea was to integrate this to the parts tracker. It can be run from the command line so I think hooking it up shouldn't be such a problem. I can also put together some other interface if that is needed.
