Description of part 33909

RE: Description of part 33909
(2020-02-19, 14:34)Jaco van der Molen Wrote: OK, so the 1x2 jumper should also get the tile keyword.

Not according to my rule, as its studless area isn't contiguous, but I get that we want it to match the 2x2 jumper. My approach to that would be to disqualify the 2x2 jumper, since its studless area is also not "contiguous" in the way I envisioned. (You couldn't simply place the 3 missing studs back onto that part.)

On the other hand, it may also be desirable to use the "tile" keyword for any part that currently has that word in its description, and only apply the rule to new parts (if at all). But, keywords are pretty much up to the author's discretion anyway, so I don't know that there's anything stopping people from adding "tile" as a keyword if they feel it's appropriately descriptive.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
RE: Description of part 33909 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-02-19, 15:39

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)