Description of part 33909


RE: Description of part 33909
#17
(2020-02-18, 21:25)N. W. Perry Wrote: If we wanted to recognize "tile" as an optional keyword for tile-like parts that have some studs, perhaps the rule could be that only studless plates are categorized as "tiles", but any plate that is missing studs on at least 50% of its contiguous surface area is entitled to the optional "tile" keyword. So the 4x6 plate with studs around the edges would qualify (12 of 24 nominal studs are absent), but not the jumper (1 of 2 nominal studs is absent, but not within a contiguous area).
Basically I agree, but I wonder where the threshold should be. I am a bit annoyed that the 2x2 with one stud jumper qualifies as tile and not the 1x2...
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Description of part 33909 - by Philippe Hurbain - 2020-02-19, 9:20

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)