> Some of the images have the same number as the part it is printed on.
I like that. This easily makes them associable.
I cannot imagine any numbering scheme which would be _better_.
Example:
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cg...252p02.png
> Some of the images have the same number as the sticker sheet.
Also a nice solution. It in fact follows the above principle.
The image carries the same number as 1 part where it can be found on.
> Should the 5 or 7 digit number be used?
I cannot answer this. Maybe someone else?
> Some of the images have the same number as the cardboard design use.
I cannot answer this. Maybe someone else?
> All of the stickers from the EV3 set use the 5 digit sticker number. Why?
I cannot answer this. Maybe someone else?
> Is there somewhere an standard for how we should review/handle parts which use a texmap image?
Run them through the PT normally IMHO.
What problem do you see?
> Question regarding partnumber u9252:
> Bricklink have LEGO partnumbers on these four cardboards, 191764-191767.
> What number should be used on these cards, and there texmap images?
I'm fine with renumbering the u9252pXX parts
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptpatterns.cgi?p=u9252
to 191764-191767 if that is preferred.
Of course, the TEXMAPs used in them should follow that renumbering.
I like that. This easily makes them associable.
I cannot imagine any numbering scheme which would be _better_.
Example:
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cg...252p02.png
> Some of the images have the same number as the sticker sheet.
Also a nice solution. It in fact follows the above principle.
The image carries the same number as 1 part where it can be found on.
> Should the 5 or 7 digit number be used?
I cannot answer this. Maybe someone else?
> Some of the images have the same number as the cardboard design use.
I cannot answer this. Maybe someone else?
> All of the stickers from the EV3 set use the 5 digit sticker number. Why?
I cannot answer this. Maybe someone else?
> Is there somewhere an standard for how we should review/handle parts which use a texmap image?
Run them through the PT normally IMHO.
What problem do you see?
> Question regarding partnumber u9252:
> Bricklink have LEGO partnumbers on these four cardboards, 191764-191767.
> What number should be used on these cards, and there texmap images?
I'm fine with renumbering the u9252pXX parts
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptpatterns.cgi?p=u9252
to 191764-191767 if that is preferred.
Of course, the TEXMAPs used in them should follow that renumbering.