What requires a HOLD vote on the Parts Tracker

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RE: What requires a HOLD vote on the Parts Tracker
#58
I have now gotten a proof-of-concept part checker up:

Tests currently implemented:
  • Check for self-intersecting, skew and concave quads
  • Check for collinearity
  • Check for zero matrix determinant (row or column all zero)
  • Check for scaling of not-scalable primitives (needs some kind of threshold)
  • Check for invalid colours (not in LDConfig.ldr and not direct colours, restrictions on direct colours not yet implemented)

The quadrilateral checks can create redundant errors, e.g. a report for concave quad when it's actually a bowtie, because technically bowtie quads are concave and there's separate tests making these results.

No header tests yet because the header currently is not parsed at all. No corrections performed yet either.

Also includes a test for very thin polygons (smallest angle less than 0.5°). While they are not considered a problem, they're reported as a purely informational notice since they can point to other problems (e.g. gaps).
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: What requires a HOLD vote on the Parts Tracker - by Santeri Piippo - 2018-01-31, 13:18

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)