BL part numbers


RE: BL part numbers
#7
(2016-10-24, 19:41)Magnus Forsberg Wrote:
(2016-10-22, 3:17)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Do we add the BL part number as a keyword if it differs from the LDraw number? 

There is already a small group of parts that have a keyword "Bricklink XXX "
Only 17 examples exists today. Four of them have been made official parts.

We have ~2725 parts using the word Pattern in the description.
Is there anyone who would want to do that job and recreate the link between LDraw and Bricklink pattern numbers? I don't.

Why  should we favor Bricklink numbers? I think we should work on the LEGO-Ldraw connection instead.

I agree not retroactively processing the entire library. My thoughts were more to current and future parts on the PT
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
BL part numbers - by Orion Pobursky - 2016-10-22, 3:17
RE: BL part numbers - by Damien Roux - 2016-10-24, 8:44
RE: BL part numbers - by Willy Tschager - 2016-10-24, 19:14
RE: BL part numbers - by Damien Roux - 2016-10-24, 19:49
RE: BL part numbers - by Philippe Hurbain - 2016-10-24, 20:15
RE: BL part numbers - by Magnus Forsberg - 2016-10-24, 19:41
RE: BL part numbers - by Orion Pobursky - 2016-10-24, 20:29

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)