Very well. Your write up looks interesting.
On the post I linked, I hadn't really looked at Johann's update so If his scenario is different from Artius' then I will certainly update LPub3D if it is determined to be in regression. On the other hand, I clearly demonstrated that Artius' expectation was actually not the way either LPub3D or even LPub actually behaved. This position is demonstrated in the post I shared.
So. I am open to evolving the BUFEXCHG behaviour (while keeping backward compatibility of course) to make it more efficient because some users seem to be confused by the current behaviour (I get lots of request on the good pattern to implement). Moreover, the feature is quite valuable to producing hi-fidelity instructions.
Im wrapping up my x11 ports (Linux and OSX) so I should be in a position to take a look at putting this on the stack after that. Do not hesitate if you have any additional ideas on how we could improve this feature.
Cheers,
On the post I linked, I hadn't really looked at Johann's update so If his scenario is different from Artius' then I will certainly update LPub3D if it is determined to be in regression. On the other hand, I clearly demonstrated that Artius' expectation was actually not the way either LPub3D or even LPub actually behaved. This position is demonstrated in the post I shared.
So. I am open to evolving the BUFEXCHG behaviour (while keeping backward compatibility of course) to make it more efficient because some users seem to be confused by the current behaviour (I get lots of request on the good pattern to implement). Moreover, the feature is quite valuable to producing hi-fidelity instructions.
Im wrapping up my x11 ports (Linux and OSX) so I should be in a position to take a look at putting this on the stack after that. Do not hesitate if you have any additional ideas on how we could improve this feature.
Cheers,