Thinking about LDCad 2.0 and open sourcing it


RE: Thinking about LDCad 2.0 and open sourcing it
#6
(2016-05-30, 15:18)Milan Vančura Wrote: about the license: please check the list and rules for Linux distros so you don't fall into problems at the beginning, for example: openSUSE packaging guidelines, Debian packaging guidelines.
I'll have to get into that at some point, thanks for the links.

(2016-05-30, 15:18)Milan Vančura Wrote: about the language: JAVA is "a legal hell". It was always a pain and now, after Oracle bought Sun company, it's a hell. I strongly recommend to ignore it. Python is slow but I've seen several desktop applications having time-critical parts in C or C++ and GUI layer written in python. Which is easy and readable and contains many modules of graphical/GUI libraries. Might be an option for you, too.
Yes but even without the legal stuff Java has some very strange ways of doing certain 'normal' things imho.

Python caught my interest as it might be good for my normal day job too. Also blender uses it, so it must do something well.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Thinking about LDCad 2.0 and open sourcing it - by Roland Melkert - 2016-05-30, 20:59

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)