Standards for stud groups


Re: Stud groups must not be scaled?
#13
Travis Cobbs Wrote:None of those exist right now, so I think none of us thought about it. Since the proposal just passed, I think the best thing to do would be to add the proposed text as passed, then have another vote to modify the text to allow them to be scaled in the Y axis for underside studs.

My expectation was that stugs consist of nothing but stud.dat.

Personally, I think stugs of tubes is really getting out of hand. What's so bad about just replicating the stud/tube/widget n times? With studs, it made some sense (for logo orientation), but for tubes?

In any event, this is an issue for part authors to get excited about, not me.

Allen
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Standards for stud groups - by Tim Gould - 2011-11-15, 10:08
Re: Standards for stud groups - by Tim Gould - 2011-11-15, 22:17
Re: Standards for stud groups - by Chris Dee - 2011-11-23, 20:53
Re: Stud groups must not be scaled? - by Allen Smith - 2011-12-09, 17:16
why stugs exist / scaling - by Steffen - 2011-12-09, 23:17
Re: why stugs exist / scaling - by Steffen - 2011-12-09, 23:58

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)