|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: v 1.7 beta 2a snapping feature
Post: RE: v 1.7 beta 2a snapping feature
|
Nicolas19 Wrote: (2026-03-03, 17:05)
--
With version v1.7 beta 2a, I no longer have the automatic part snapping feature.
Is there a specific configuration for this new version ?
--
You are the sec... |
|
Roland Melkert |
LDraw Editors and Viewers
|
3 |
401 |
2026-03-04, 7:43 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
Hageta Wrote: (2026-02-28, 16:56)
--
I like how layers are implemented in this example. In this examples the coordinates of the pattern match the coordinates of the part, how would you reuse a patter... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-28, 21:04 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
| First test result:
Source mpd attached.
This projects the ldr given in !TEXMAP onto a tight fitting 1280x1280 texture. And then use it like any normal TEXMAP texture.
The final version has ... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-27, 22:40 |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping Frame Rate when MPD View is open in Part Bin
Post: RE: Dropping Frame Rate when MPD View is open in P...
|
Gerald Lasser Wrote: (2026-02-22, 13:16)
--
My question is more towards the direction if the rendering of the preview-images can be reduced, e.g.:
- only once a part has been placed, or e.g. a secon... |
|
Roland Melkert |
LDraw Editors and Viewers
|
5 |
833 |
2026-02-24, 20:12 |
| |
|
Thread: Dropping Frame Rate when MPD View is open in Part Bin
Post: RE: Dropping Frame Rate when MPD View is open in P...
|
Gerald Lasser Wrote: (2026-02-21, 23:16)
--
I had an intermittent issue with LDCad where i experienced an incredible drop in the frame rate, down to 1 fps from a 20 fps rendering.
--
It renders whene... |
|
Roland Melkert |
LDraw Editors and Viewers
|
5 |
833 |
2026-02-22, 7:29 |
| |
|
Thread: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2a (win+linux)
Post: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2a (win+linux)
| Someone reported a semi severe bug in beta 2 concerning file reloading.
This version will fix that and a couple of other minor issues reported so far.
No new features though.
As always yo... |
|
Roland Melkert |
LDraw Editors and Viewers
|
0 |
299 |
2026-02-21, 20:13 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
Max Murtazin Wrote: (2026-02-19, 16:51)
--
In short, when you use anything non-raster as a texture, you gotta rasterize it at some step, and that step would most likely be before supplying it to the ... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-19, 18:23 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
N. W. Perry Wrote: (2026-02-14, 15:04)
--
I'm a little ignorant on this side of things. What projection info is needed that's different for LDraw code than the three methods we have now for PNG?
--
T... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-14, 20:02 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
Travis Cobbs Wrote: (2026-02-13, 0:15)
--
So, I want to step back. Is this functionality really something that part authors will use, and is it useful enough to justify implementation?
--
Besides t... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-13, 22:05 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
| Been thinking about implementing a proof of concept in a special build of LDCad.
Needed:
- Projection (probably best to let the spec define a static one like Ortho looking at the z direction)
- Inter... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-12, 21:07 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
N. W. Perry Wrote: (2026-02-11, 19:45)
--
!DATA does that—my idea was that !CODE would do the same for non-binary data. It was originally meant for SVG code, but I thought it code also be useful for ... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-12, 18:23 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
N. W. Perry Wrote: (2026-02-11, 14:34)
--
Do we need !CODE? For library purposes
--
No it is only for embedding png's inside a mpd on the user side.
N. W. Perry Wrote: (2026-02-11, 14:34)
--
How ca... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-11, 15:50 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
N. W. Perry Wrote: (2026-02-11, 5:50)
--
This reminds me to ask, how would the LDraw texture code be provided?
--
I don't see the need to make any kind of special type of subfile, any ldraw file coul... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-11, 7:55 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
Max Murtazin Wrote: (2026-02-09, 13:56)
--
Reason for banning overlapping geometry is very much practical, as it leads to a lot of trouble when rendering it, such as z-fighting
--
I would suggest to ... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-10, 22:25 |
| |
|
Thread: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
Post: RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specif...
|
Max Murtazin Wrote: (2026-02-03, 17:25)
--
Also, with any such extension to me a problem of backwards compatibility begins to look worse with each time. Realistically, this would only enlarge the num... |
|
Roland Melkert |
Official File Specifications/Standards
|
60 |
7,848 |
2026-02-03, 22:09 |
| |
|
Thread: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+linux)
Post: RE: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+linux)
|
Johann Eisner Wrote: (2026-02-01, 16:42)
--
Small bug found:
If a part or submodel is replaced by another, this change is not recognized and the file cannot be saved.
--
Very weird the 'Changed i... |
|
Roland Melkert |
LDraw Editors and Viewers
|
24 |
4,186 |
2026-02-02, 20:39 |
| |
|
Thread: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+linux)
Post: RE: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+linux)
|
Magnus Forsberg Wrote: (2026-01-31, 20:57)
--
Why do I see a copy of my LDConfig after I close any model?
I'm using the (renamed) LDCfgalt-file.
--
Like a session?
I made big changes to the wa... |
|
Roland Melkert |
LDraw Editors and Viewers
|
24 |
4,186 |
2026-01-31, 21:18 |
| |
|
Thread: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+linux)
Post: RE: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+linux)
|
Roland Melkert Wrote: (2026-01-17, 22:31)
--
Well it took over 2.5 years but here it finally is: 1.7 Beta 2
--
FYI:
There is a bug relating to external file change reloading which will crash th... |
|
Roland Melkert |
LDraw Editors and Viewers
|
24 |
4,186 |
2026-01-31, 20:05 |
| |
|
Thread: 7660 not showing in partsbin & looks terrible
Post: RE: 7660 not showing in partsbin & looks terrible
| Both issues indicate a wrong search path configuration.
The mystery donor location is the default one added when none are set.
Could you post the '' section of main.cfg? |
|
Roland Melkert |
Parts Authoring
|
3 |
679 |
2026-01-30, 0:27 |
| |
|
Thread: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+linux)
Post: RE: LDCad 1.7 Beta 2 (win+linux)
|
Jaco van der Molen Wrote: (2026-01-28, 7:00)
--
OK, no idea why, but I set the search library paths to my Custom unofficial parts and Helper parts again and I set up a link to my LDConfig.ldr on Goog... |
|
Roland Melkert |
LDraw Editors and Viewers
|
24 |
4,186 |
2026-01-28, 20:48 |
