+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: Models and Parts (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-18.html)
+--- Forum: Parts Authoring (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-19.html)
+--- Thread: Does 32125 still need rewrite? (/thread-5203.html)
Does 32125 still need rewrite? - Greg Teft - 2012-06-20
I've seen this on the list for a while, with CCAL 2.0 in the header, but still needing work.
Anyone mind if I re-address this?
Re: Does 32125 still need rewrite? - Tim Gould - 2012-06-20
Given the irregularity of comments I say Just Do it.
Tim
Re: Does 32125 still need rewrite? - Greg Teft - 2012-06-20
I figured as much - here's the work in progress, will measure split above the axle hole when I get home this weekend and move symmetrical geometry to sub-files.
A note on the hex-ring (current 32152s02.dat) if anyone wants to make this a primitive and use it, grab it. It won't work with the split above the axle hole, so will be reusing s02
UPDATED: REMOVED WIP - UPDATE SUBMITTED.
Re: Does 32125 still need rewrite? - Chris Dee - 2012-06-20
Yes, please. This is the last remaining Non-CA authored part. Let's finish the re-write and finally kill the Non-CA section of the official library.
Re: Does 32125 still need rewrite? - Greg Teft - 2012-06-26
Update submitted.