+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: Models and Parts (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-18.html)
+--- Forum: Parts Authoring (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-19.html)
+--- Thread: Are standards for official parts too strict? (/thread-3697.html)
Pages:
1
2
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - Philippe Hurbain - 2013-01-18
I am OK with this solution. MLCad 3.4 does no longer remove blank lines.
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - Michael Heidemann - 2013-01-18
Thanks for mention that.
I just tried version 3.4 of MLCad and it saves also blank lines. So that should not be a problem
.I go ahead and try to change DATHeader now.
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - Michael Heidemann - 2013-01-18
In fact DATHeader deleted empty lines in there has been an error with comments detected and you correted them.
While I am currently at this, I think DATHeader should now also "empty" lines that only consists of "0 //".
So the number of lines should not be affected during this operation.
Edit:
While I am just on the code I also limit the part description to Integer.MaxValue according the call for votes on this issue.