![]() |
|
Fire logos - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: Models and Parts (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-18.html) +--- Forum: Parts Authoring (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-19.html) +--- Thread: Fire logos (/thread-29663.html) |
Fire logos - Willy Tschager - 2026-10-15 Would you agree that there have been three variants of the fire logo over the years: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=374.1stk01#T=C&C=0 https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=2494pb07#T=C&C=15 https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=7239stk01#T=C&C=0 Question is: mark them with a/the years in the prim title or "Type 1,2,3,"? Some patterns are clearly wrong: https://library.ldraw.org/parts/138 Thoughts? w. RE: Fire logos - Chris Böhnke - 2026-10-15 Actually there are currently 8 different logos:
Admittedly some are rather similar and can probably reuse some sub-files, but they clearly are not identical. The list does not include ones that only appeared on very few parts and those from non-minifig themes such as Duplo, Jack Stone, Technic, Fabuland etc. I am strongly in favour of using the years to mark them. "Type x" is too arbitrary Imo and requires more knowledge than "I want to use the logo from 2 years ago". How many different ones were inbetween? Are the "Type x" even in the correct chronological order? Those problems are much less a thing when using years. Same can be applied to other things, Star Wars in particular. Agree that there are some errors in the current parts (especially the older ones). |