![]() |
|
Partial reviews - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html) +--- Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: Partial reviews (/thread-29173.html) |
Partial reviews - Peter Blomberg - 2025-11-17 How should partial reviews be mentioned? Is there a short list of items that can be used for classifying partial reviews? Like a,b, and c checked, but d, e, f, and g not. Perhaps:
My review process looks something like this: Make a search/filter in the parts tracker to obtain a batch of similar parts for review. If a part has unresolved issues in the existing comments or a hold vote I accept, it won't be selected. Mainly freeform parts -Edger2 with default settings. On error report findings as hold or comment. When I'm lazy, I only report what Edger2 complains about. Otherwise, I try to figure out why Edger2 complains to make the error report more useful. -BFC, Gaps, Edges in LDView. On error report findings as hold or comment. Important to mention coordinates. -Origin, Prim use, Overlap, Vertex rounding, compl cond, prim subst. On error report findings as hold or comment -Fit to other parts, bottom stud connectivity, Help. On error report findings as hold -Links, Number/name, Visual similarity. On error report findings as comment -Vote certify if no error Mainly geometric primitives -Origin, Bounding box, Fit to other parts. On error report findings as hold -Prim use, Edges, Gaps, Overlap, BFC, Vertex rounding. On error report findings as hold or comment -Links, Number/name, Visual similarity to real part/pictures. On error report findings as comment -Keywords, Description, History, Admin stuff. On error report findings as comment -Vote certify if no error This means that only a subset of parts in a batch make it all the way through to voting certify. The complementary subset ends up with partial reviews. |