![]() |
advice on ring primitives - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: Models and Parts (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-18.html) +--- Forum: Parts Authoring (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-19.html) +--- Thread: advice on ring primitives (/thread-28714.html) |
advice on ring primitives - Peter Blomberg - 2025-03-08 I need a 1-6 ring primitive. It does not yet exist in the size I need or any size near the correct size. Which option is best? a) create the 1-6 ring as a new primitive, b) combine a 1-8 ring primitive with a rotated 1-24 ring primitive (both exist in a nearby size), b) use the 1-8 ring as primitive and add the two missing segments as quads, c) define all segments as quads, i.e. not use primitives. RE: advice on ring primitives - Rene Rechthaler - 2025-03-08 1-6 is hi-res? what size do you need? for what? are there other prims (cyli/o/c or disc/chrd/ndis) next to it? you can generate prims yourself with the PrimGen (included in the LDPE) there you can define inner/outer diameter and let it generate the prim... maybe also check the rings+cones tool in LDPE to check if it can be done with something else. RE: advice on ring primitives - Gerald Lasser - 2025-03-08 generally speaking every prim that is required and is smaller that 1-4 can/should be create if it is not existing. Try to avoid to rotate prims by anglesĀ other than 90 deg to make a another one, e.g. combinign ring primitives. As Rene suggested use the PrimGen of LDPE to generate it. RE: advice on ring primitives - Peter Blomberg - 2025-03-09 Thanks for the replies. I will henceforth create any missing prim smaller than 1-4. |