LDraw.org Discussion Forums
[Fixed] Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Printable Version

+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: Models and Parts (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-18.html)
+--- Forum: Parts Authoring (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-19.html)
+--- Thread: [Fixed] Error with 44568 (official part) ? (/thread-28381.html)



Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Bertrand Lequy - 2024-08-17

Hi again.

It seems there's an error with 44568. The usage of p\clh6 is not correct since it's symetrical and the two fingers are not on this part.

I have this part on my desk right now and I see the same that's shown on this picture :
[Image: 6276045.jpg]

Does it exist two versions of this part, one with symetrical fingers and one without ?


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Rene Rechthaler - 2024-08-17

looks like you are correct and the official part is wrong...
fortunately, the correct "fingers are already there:
https://library.ldraw.org/official/29539
https://library.ldraw.org/official/29540
in this part: https://library.ldraw.org/official/26031
maybe its sufficient to fix it by just replacing it.
(the new fingers are much newer than the part)


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Magnus Forsberg - 2024-08-17

(2024-08-17, 10:18)Rene Rechthaler Wrote: looks like you are correct and the official part is wrong...
fortunately, the correct "fingers are already there:
https://library.ldraw.org/official/29539
https://library.ldraw.org/official/29540
in this part: https://library.ldraw.org/official/26031
maybe its sufficient to fix it by just replacing it.
(the new fingers are much newer than the part)

Are there 2 versions or not?


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Rene Rechthaler - 2024-08-17

checked my parts: they are all the same (with the up/down fingers)
-> official part is wrong


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Gerald Lasser - 2024-08-17

Rene is right, only up/down are existing. I think we had this discussion somewhere in the forum. I made the prim, but I can't remember why the part was not touched.


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Rene Rechthaler - 2024-08-17

Do you then want to fix the part (since the prims are yours)?


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Gerald Lasser - 2024-08-17

corrected including other geometry

https://library.ldraw.org/tracker/39839


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Magnus Forsberg - 2024-08-17

(2024-08-17, 11:57)Gerald Lasser Wrote: corrected including other geometry

https://library.ldraw.org/tracker/39839

What's the benefit of this design?


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Gerald Lasser - 2024-08-17

I guess the force required to disassemble the two parts of the hinges is less, you can twist it....

Edit: After doing some tests, I can't really tell what's better


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Rene Rechthaler - 2024-08-17

same reason why 95120.dat has holes through the bottom: to get an easier molding...
if there are two full dents facing each other, it would be quite difficult to unmold.


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Gerald Lasser - 2024-08-17

(2024-08-17, 15:28)Rene Rechthaler Wrote: same reason why 95120.dat has holes through the bottom: to get an easier molding...
if there are two full dents facing each other, it would be quite difficult to unmold.

yes, of course :facepalm:


RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ? - Bertrand Lequy - 2024-08-18

thank you everybody.