+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html)
+--- Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: Bug Advisory: Leading BFC Statements (/thread-27702.html)
Bug Advisory: Leading BFC Statements - Orion Pobursky - 2023-09-06
A bug in the Parts Tracker is stripping any BFC statements that are the first line of the part body.
Example
Code:
<part header>
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2-4cyli.datIn the above case the "BFC INVERTNEXT" statement would be removed.
To mitigate this issue, have at least one non-BFC line as the start of the body
Example:
Code:
<part header>
1 0 0 20 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2-4cyli.datThe above BFC statement will not be affected.
This bug has the potential to affect all parts submitted, released, or header edited since approximately Julyl 16.
RE: Bug Advisory: Leading BFC Statements - Travis Cobbs - 2023-09-06
(2023-09-06, 17:45)Orion Pobursky Wrote: A bug in the Parts Tracker is stripping any BFC statements that are the first line of the part body.
Does the BFC CERTIFY/NOTCERTIFY statement count as part of the header, so it is not impacted by this? Because if not, then I think it would be impossible to have any parts that don't violate the specs.
RE: Bug Advisory: Leading BFC Statements - Orion Pobursky - 2023-09-06
(2023-09-06, 18:30)Travis Cobbs Wrote: Does the BFC CERTIFY/NOTCERTIFY statement count as part of the header, so it is not impacted by this? Because if not, then I think it would be impossible to have any parts that don't violate the specs.
The header and the body are parsed separately. The header is unaffected by the bug.
RE: Bug Advisory: Leading BFC Statements - Orion Pobursky - 2023-09-07
The bug is fixed. All potentially affected files have not been checked