+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html)
+--- Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-32.html)
+--- Thread: !NEEDS_WORK Meta command (/thread-27493.html)
!NEEDS_WORK Meta command - Orion Pobursky - 2023-06-12
What's the feeling on a !NEEDS_WORK meta? Would this be better than the current way of doing things?
Here's my proposal
0 !NEEDS_WORK <reason>
Where:
<reason> is a short description of what aspect of the part needs work.
RE: !NEEDS_WORK Meta command - Roland Melkert - 2023-06-12
(2023-06-12, 20:49)Orion Pobursky Wrote: What's the feeling on a !NEEDS_WORK meta? Would this be better than the current way of doing things?
Like the TODO in source code?
Seems simple enough.
RE: !NEEDS_WORK Meta command - Javier Orquera - 2023-06-12
(2023-06-12, 20:49)Orion Pobursky Wrote: What's the feeling on a !NEEDS_WORK meta? Would this be better than the current way of doing things?
Here's my proposal
0 !NEEDS_WORK <reason>
Where:
<reason> is a short description of what aspect of the part needs work.
With my little knowledge I not oppose, but whay don't keep it as is and use the Help meta command to clarify the issiu? Also it work as a reminder to the users that there is something bad with the part when you read the name.
RE: !NEEDS_WORK Meta command - Orion Pobursky - 2023-06-12
(2023-06-12, 21:51)Javier Orquera Wrote: With my little knowledge I not oppose, but whay don't keep it as is and use the Help meta command to clarify the issiu? Also it work as a reminder to the users that there is something bad with the part when you read the name.
You bring up a good point. I think the !HELP method is probably better than a new meta.