Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html) +--- Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction (/thread-25980.html) |
Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Orion Pobursky - 2022-01-25 I think everything with "Technic Bionicle ..." should be retitled "Constraction ..." with "Bionicle" added as a KEYWORD. Thoughts? RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Max Martin Richter - 2022-01-25 (2022-01-25, 5:09)Orion Pobursky Wrote: I think everything with "Technic Bionicle ..." should be retitled "Constraction ..." with "Bionicle" added as a KEYWORD. As I recently reviewed such a part, I wondered, if this should be done or not. I'm not sure how many official Bionicle we have, but I like the suggestion. Go for it! RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Philippe Hurbain - 2022-01-25 (2022-01-25, 5:53)Max Martin Richter Wrote: As I recently reviewed such a part, I wondered, if this should be done or not.Looks perfect with the keyword. RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Magnus Forsberg - 2022-01-25 I don't think a simple change like that is good. We need to have a more specific approach, part by part. I see a badly named minifig body in the list, among other parts, that would only end up in another bad place. I remember an image, can't find it now, describing the idea behind these figures. On the basic level there's body/skelleton parts, like torso, leg, arm, foot, hand, ... Next is a layer of shields and armoured body parts. Next is a layer of decorations like spikes, pins, emblems, attached on the body of the figure. Then, all the accessories and weapons. We have both Constraction and Constraction Accessory in the list of categories to use here. But many of them would be better named as Constraction, than Technic Bionicle. RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Orion Pobursky - 2022-01-25 I don't really follow you on the layer discussion. Can you use some examples? RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - N. W. Perry - 2022-01-25 (2022-01-25, 17:54)Orion Pobursky Wrote: I don't really follow you on the layer discussion. Can you use some examples? Perhaps this? https://en.brickimedia.org/wiki/File:Ccbs_system.jpeg RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Magnus Forsberg - 2022-01-25 (2022-01-25, 17:54)Orion Pobursky Wrote: I don't really follow you on the layer discussion. Can you use some examples? Found it. https://www.newelementary.com/2014/11/lego-bionicle-2015-exclusive-new-parts-elements.html The paragraph in this text called CCBS describe what I was trying to say. Or this image. Had a second look at the list of Technic Bionicle parts and most of them are possible to rename like you suggested. RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Magnus Forsberg - 2022-01-25 (2022-01-25, 21:23)N. W. Perry Wrote: Perhaps this? Yes, you found it too. RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Orion Pobursky - 2022-01-26 (2022-01-25, 22:27)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: Found it. So based on this, anything in the CCBS "core" is Constraction and anything that attaches to the "core" is Constraction Accessory. I'm open to adding more "Constraction ..." categories but not too many. At the end of the day I want to recategorize anything "Technic Bionicle" to either just "Technic" or "Constraction ...". It is relatively easy to recategorize a part from Constraction to Techinic if a part is adopted into the wider Technic design. RE: Technic Bionicle vs. Constraction - Max Murtazin - 2022-07-02 (2022-01-26, 16:03)Orion Pobursky Wrote: So based on this, anything in the CCBS "core" is Constraction and anything that attaches to the "core" is Constraction Accessory. I'm open to adding more "Constraction ..." categories but not too many. Does core include only "bones", or armor shells are included too? |