LDraw.org Discussion Forums
PT Mockup - Printable Version

+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: Administrative (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Website Suggestions/Requests/Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: PT Mockup (/thread-23460.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8


RE: PT Mockup - Damien Roux - 2019-06-17

(2019-06-12, 13:14)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Any more “oh by the ways”

I think I'm a bit late, but would it be complicated to add an option to choose to display part picture on the Parts List and on the Activity pages?

But actually, I must say I love this new layout, great job!


RE: PT Mockup - Orion Pobursky - 2019-06-17

(2019-06-17, 20:37)Damien Roux Wrote: I think I'm a bit late, but would it be complicated to add an option to choose to display part picture on the Parts List and on the Activity pages?

But actually, I must say I love this new layout, great job!

This would require new code. This project focused on changing the markup.


RE: PT Mockup - Gerald Lasser - 2019-06-17

(2019-06-17, 19:33)Orion Pobursky Wrote: We are now live. The only glaring error I can find is history which I’ll look at fixing tonight.

Orion,

Concerning the alignment of the parts, I think this was everything on the top (Pic top below the cert-status) thus the pics were in one line. Have a look at the Minifig Heads 
Can you make them in a line again?

thanks!


RE: PT Mockup - Orion Pobursky - 2019-06-17

(2019-06-17, 19:48)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Activity and ptlist also break formatting on mobile (but are fine on large screens) . I’ll fix that tonight as well.

Activity on mobile is fixed. Turns out it was a mobile Safari quirk.


RE: PT Mockup - Orion Pobursky - 2019-06-18

(2019-06-17, 19:48)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Activity and ptlist also break formatting on mobile (but are fine on large screens) . I’ll fix that tonight as well.

part list is now fixed. Pattern summary update coming soon.


RE: PT Mockup - Jaco van der Molen - 2019-06-18

(2019-06-17, 19:33)Orion Pobursky Wrote: We are now live.

Looks very good Orion! Smile


RE: PT Mockup - Orion Pobursky - 2019-06-18

(2019-06-18, 6:12)Jaco van der Molen Wrote: Looks very good Orion! Smile

Thanks. I just realized that we have now rid ourselves of the last vestige of the PostNuke CMS well over 10 years after we switched.


RE: PT Mockup - Johann Eisner - 2019-06-18

(2019-06-17, 19:33)Orion Pobursky Wrote: We are now live.....

PT looks great.

Another question:
Is it normal that the Forum is not so width as the PT?
I have only a 15,6" Notebook, maybe that's the reason.


RE: PT Mockup - Orion Pobursky - 2019-06-18

(2019-06-18, 18:14)Johann Eisner Wrote: PT looks great.

Another question:
Is it normal that the Forum is not so width as the PT?
I have only a 15,6" Notebook, maybe that's the reason.

Yes. The forum is using different theming and markup.


RE: PT Mockup - Steffen - 2019-06-18

I also like the new look a lot.
I have some minor improvement suggestions, but they can wait.

Here is one that I would like to ask right now:
can we modify the text that is displayed for a part as heading
- for the required files
- for its parent files?

Currently, the PT displays the texts
- "Required (unofficial) subfiles:" and
- "Related (unofficial) subfiles:"

, and both do not make sense. I would like to see that changed to:
- "Required Files:"
- "Parent Files:"

The reasoning is this:
1. nowadays, not all required files are "subparts" anymore. For example, for aliases, the required file is a normal part. See 55707c as example. So the wording "subfiles" for the required files is wrong IMHO.
2. the addition "(unofficial)" is completely unnecessary, because only such files are displayed. Official ones are not shown on the PT as dependency. The word only adds clutter.
3. for parent files, the wording "subfiles" makes no sense at all, it never did. We all just got used to the ever same text on the PT pages.