![]() |
LDCad 1.6b suport files test - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: LDraw Programs (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: LDraw Editors and Viewers (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-11.html) +--- Thread: LDCad 1.6b suport files test (/thread-22656.html) |
LDCad 1.6b suport files test - Roland Melkert - 2018-01-10 Hello all, I've been working on the LDCad snapinfo for the 1701 library and one thing lead to another so I also ended up tweaking the part bin a bit. I would appreciate some additional eyes on these tweaks in means of some QA ![]() I've added snapping info for all the 1701 stuff that is visible in the sorted branch (except for things in the 'by category' subbrances) I also added a duplo and electric section to the sorted branch and gave everything in there snapping info too. I'm wondering about the electric parts group though, should I extend it more and maybe subdivide or keep it restricted to the non technic stuff like it is now? And I also added templates for the new 9L/11L shocks. any additional ideas/snapping/template requests etc are welcome. You can use these files with 1.6a by replacing the seed (*.sf) files you'll find in the below zip. These files are usually in "program files/LDCad/seeds" http://www.melkert.net/action/download/1-6b-seedsTest.zip Just be sure to use it with the 1701 library as it includes corrections resulting from "~moved" stuff etc. RE: LDCad 1.6b suport files test - Philippe Hurbain - 2018-01-10 Works fine so far. The only thing I noticed is that the 31623/6523 duplo axle with 8t gear are missing the "slide" property. The misc hinges bin might need a forced mascot, currently on my machine it uses the (unofficial) Fabuland merry go round seat holder... Quote:I'm wondering about the electric parts group though, should I extend it more and maybe subdivide or keep it restricted to the non technic stuff like it is now?Not an easy one... there are some inconsistencies (eg. I find the RCX in the Technic Mindstorms group, but I have to go to the generic electric group to find its sensors). Where do I find battery boxes (Technic or not)? What about Wedo parts? RE: LDCad 1.6b suport files test - Merlijn Wissink - 2018-01-10 (2018-01-10, 0:10)Roland Melkert Wrote: [...] Yes! I've got a request! ![]() RE: LDCad 1.6b suport files test - Roland Melkert - 2018-01-10 (2018-01-10, 10:01)Merlijn Wissink Wrote: Yes! I've got a request! Attached is a rough try, but it might need a 'mid segment' like the technic hoses. I can't add it to the official package as it depends on unoffical (sub)parts. ![]() edit: corrected the file header so it will show up in the bin when placed in %appdata%\LDCad\templates\path RE: LDCad 1.6b suport files test - Roland Melkert - 2018-01-10 Thanks I've fixed the axles. (2018-01-10, 8:30)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Not an easy one... there are some inconsistencies (eg. I find the RCX in the Technic Mindstorms group, but I have to go to the generic electric group to find its sensors). Where do I find battery boxes (Technic or not)? What about Wedo parts? Yes this is what's bothering me too, maybe it should become a whole sub branch splitting into rcx/nxt/wedo/4.5v/12v. RE: LDCad 1.6b suport files test - Merlijn Wissink - 2018-01-10 (2018-01-10, 18:37)Roland Melkert Wrote:(2018-01-10, 10:01)Merlijn Wissink Wrote: Yes! I've got a request! Wow, that was quick! It seems to work perfectly fine too, only the origin of the part (in non-nested mode) is a bit weird. Many thanks Roland! It will be put to good use in the nearby future ![]() RE: LDCad 1.6b suport files test - Roland Melkert - 2018-01-10 (2018-01-10, 20:53)Merlijn Wissink Wrote: Wow, that was quick! It seems to work perfectly fine too, only the origin of the part (in non-nested mode) is a bit weird. I did forget to shift to 0,0,0. You can do this in the template itself by selecting the thing you want a 0,0,0 followed by ctrl+a and shift+c . You need to do the same in any mpd using a copy of it just be sure to apply it in the subfile's own session and not through nesting. |