LDraw.org Discussion Forums
OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Printable Version

+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html)
+--- Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-32.html)
+--- Thread: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? (/thread-18493.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Rolf Osterthun - 2016-01-03

Hey Michael,

Michael Heidemann Wrote:Now I need to find a way to transform the picture in Visual Basic Smile

that should be very easy. I think you are using .Net, so have a look at Convert.ToBase64String(Byte[]).

Rolf


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Michael Heidemann - 2016-01-04

Yes, that is correct. Yesterday evening I also found that function Smile.

I'll keep you informed about my progress on this in MPDCenter.


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Damien Roux - 2016-01-04

I have some questions :

Will this replace patterns one day?
How is dedined the png resolution?
Won't iz be better to use some kind of vectorial image format instead of pixels-based one?


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Roland Melkert - 2016-01-04

Damien Roux Wrote:Will this replace patterns one day?
I doubt it as most patterns are fairly square and thus easy to model. In such cases the old method will offer higher quality as it is basically vector based.
Damien Roux Wrote:How is dedined the png resolution?
There is no real limit I know of but in the practice you propably need to keep it below 1 megapixel to keep the OpenGL/directX usage universal.
Damien Roux Wrote:Won't iz be better to use some kind of vectorial image format instead of pixels-based one?
For the low detail ones the old method offers vector quality, for very complicated things a high res texture would be good enough. But if needed we can also add other formats then png to the standard but they will be harder to implement.


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Steffen - 2016-01-05

BTW....: we already _have_ a vectorial image format: LDRAW...
Yes, it is much simpler than e.g. SVG, but if you want to create a pattern as vector graphics - you already can..........


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Philippe Hurbain - 2016-01-05

I dream of somebody improving on Travis SvgToDat converter...


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Damien Roux - 2016-01-05

You mean: better traingulation?


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Philippe Hurbain - 2016-01-05

Yes, and possibly support of more svg features (eg. paths)


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Travis Cobbs - 2016-01-05

Wow, I totally forgot about even writing that. If anyone is interested in picking up where I left off, I'll post the source code somewhere.


Re: OMR + TEXMAPped unofficial file = ??? - Philippe Hurbain - 2016-03-17

Any new ideas about this? Chances for new specs? For compatible viewers/editors?