Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: Off Topic (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-28.html) +--- Forum: Off-Topic (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-27.html) +--- Thread: Bricklink, parts naming, etc... (/thread-10078.html) |
Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Philippe Hurbain - 2013-09-27 A very interesting -and somewhat scary - article posted on The New Elementary: Bricks, Inc Re: Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Santeri Piippo - 2013-09-27 Does this mean we cannot use Bricklink data for the parts reviewing process anymore? Their legal wording clearly implies that. Re: Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Max Martin Richter - 2013-09-27 If we do so, I think there must be a way to suppress the use of LDraw-Content (Part-Pictures) on Bricklink. Isn't it? Btw: I don't know when I used the Bricklink-Database for a review process for the last time. Normally I check the part on Brickset, in my own collection or ask friends. /Max Re: Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Orion Pobursky - 2013-09-27 As long as they are attributing LDraw, our licencing allows them to use our data. Re: Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Michael Heidemann - 2013-09-27 As this is a public forum i do not justice this behaviour. Everybody can read this! Re: Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Tim Gould - 2013-09-29 There's still a bit of a gap between what BL claim, what they can legally claim, and what they will act on. I suspect we have nothing to worry about. Tim Re: Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Ronald Vallenduuk - 2013-09-30 However as a statement of intent it's worrying... Re: Bricklink, parts naming, etc... - Michael Horvath - 2013-11-07 Similar situation at MobyGames.com, though not LEGO related. |