What's the feeling on a !NEEDS_WORK meta? Would this be better than the current way of doing things?
Here's my proposal
0 !NEEDS_WORK <reason>
Where:
<reason> is a short description of what aspect of the part needs work.
(2023-06-12, 20:49)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]What's the feeling on a !NEEDS_WORK meta? Would this be better than the current way of doing things?
Like the TODO in source code?
Seems simple enough.
(2023-06-12, 20:49)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]What's the feeling on a !NEEDS_WORK meta? Would this be better than the current way of doing things?
Here's my proposal
0 !NEEDS_WORK <reason>
Where:
<reason> is a short description of what aspect of the part needs work.
With my little knowledge I not oppose, but whay don't keep it as is and use the Help meta command to clarify the issiu? Also it work as a reminder to the users that there is something bad with the part when you read the name.
(2023-06-12, 21:51)Javier Orquera Wrote: [ -> ]With my little knowledge I not oppose, but whay don't keep it as is and use the Help meta command to clarify the issiu? Also it work as a reminder to the users that there is something bad with the part when you read the name.
You bring up a good point. I think the !HELP method is probably better than a new meta.