I forgot to hit "Post" yesterday, so here is my take
In my opinion "Tile" is a better name for those parts, due to the fact that one main side being absolutely flat.
For the "inverted Plate" I share the view of N.W. Perry
(2022-06-28, 7:26)Gerald Lasser Wrote: [ -> ]I forgot to hit "Post" yesterday, so here is my take
In my opinion "Tile" is a better name for those parts, due to the fact that one main side being absolutely flat.
For the "inverted Plate" I share the view of N.W. Perry
I see them as inverted tiles, this is clearly their use (they "tile" bottom surface, and bottom implies inverted)
(2022-06-28, 7:26)Gerald Lasser Wrote: [ -> ]For the "inverted Plate" I share the view of N.W. Perry
And my view on that is essentially the same as Travis'. I never really thought about it, but while "inverted" makes sense for slopes and bows where there's a shape that can be reflected about a horizontal axis, I can't picture how that would be for a simple plate. "Plate" only connotes the thickness of a part, not anything about its shape.
I think we have consensus but I'll leave this open to dissenting opinions until this evening my time (Pacific Daylight).
It is for sure an inverted tile. Tiles have connectivity on only one side, plates have on both. Inverting plate won't really make anything new, it still would have studs on one side and stud sockets on the other
(2022-06-28, 15:03)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]I think we have consensus but I'll leave this open to dissenting opinions until this evening my time (Pacific Daylight).
I see part 11203 is still called a plate? Didn't this make the last update?
Could you fasttrack this to Tile?
Part 35459 is a tile as is 83496
11203 didn't make it off the tracker because some issues with the subfile were corrected making it ineligible for fast track review.
(2022-09-16, 13:04)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]11203 didn't make it off the tracker because some issues with the subfile were corrected making it ineligible for fast track review.
OK, np. Maybe next update? ;-)