LDraw.org Discussion Forums

Full Version: Center Vs. Centre
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Note: In Australian English the proper spelling is "centre" unless it's part of a proper noun. We have a bunch of fixes to push:

https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi...escription
(2022-06-02, 5:00)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]Note: In Australian English the proper spelling is "centre" unless it's part of a proper noun. We have a bunch of fixes to push:

https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi...escription

Is it possible to fix the description via fasttrack? (I did the one unofficial file.)
For all parts that have an updated part at the PT, the updated version is fine. So we "only" need to fix the official files.
(2022-06-02, 10:20)Max Martin Richter Wrote: [ -> ]Is it possible to fix the description via fasttrack? (I did the one unofficial file.)
For all parts that have an updated part at the PT, the updated version is fine. So we "only" need to fix the official files.

Ya. These will be fixed via fast track.
(2022-06-02, 10:20)Max Martin Richter Wrote: [ -> ]Is it possible to fix the description via fasttrack? (I did the one unofficial file.)
For all parts that have an updated part at the PT, the updated version is fine. So we "only" need to fix the official files.

Also, I notice you fixed comments. That's fine but only the description matters for Australian English.
(2022-06-02, 5:00)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]Note: In Australian English the proper spelling is "centre" unless it's part of a proper noun. We have a bunch of fixes to push:

https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi...escription

In case I was unclear above, an example of where "Center" is appropriate is this part:
https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-par...id=4162p0a
(2022-06-02, 14:43)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]Also, I notice you fixed comments. That's fine but only the description matters for Australian English.

Yes, but it was the cross reference to the moved to part and I used the description from that to match with the comment.
(2022-06-02, 20:49)Max Martin Richter Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, but it was the cross reference to the moved to part and I used the description from that to match with the comment.

Got it