LDraw.org Discussion Forums

Full Version: Change the view of a Callout
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Hello,

I use one sub-models twice, but the second time the sub-model was rotatet by 180°. In the following picture you can see the first use of the sub-model and the callout.

[attachment=5664]

In the following picture you can see the second use of the same sub-model and the callout.

[attachment=5665]

What do I have to do to make the second callout look the same as the first callout?
In the following picture you can see a part of the "code" for the instruction.

[attachment=5666]

Regards

Manfred
I would use a rotstep 0 180 0 rel statement in the call-out....
(2020-08-31, 15:46)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: [ -> ]I would use a rotstep 0 180 0 rel statement in the call-out....






Hello Philippe,



Thank you for your reply.



I changed the code as follows:


[attachment=5673]



In this step the following error message was displayed:



[attachment=5675]



After pressing the OK field, the sheet is displayed.

But the result is wrong



[attachment=5674]



The callout (picture) is missing. I forgot to say, I am using version 2.3.6.

Regards

Manfred
(2020-09-01, 15:19)Manfred Schäfer Wrote: [ -> ]Hello Philippe,



Thank you for your reply.



I changed the code as follows:






In this step the following error message was displayed:







After pressing the OK field, the sheet is displayed.

But the result is wrong







The callout (picture) is missing. I forgot to say, I am using version 2.3.6.

Regards

Manfred
Hi

Did you change anything in the matrix?
The correct line for the second callout should be:
1 19 0 -24 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 Sub 21002-001.ldr

Philos opinion was you should insert the ROTSTEP command in front of the code in the callout.
Between the header an the first part line..
But this will probably not cause any change, except that the first callout is then also rotated.

Johann
(2020-09-01, 15:49)Johann Eisner Wrote: [ -> ]But this will probably not cause any change, except that the first callout is then also rotated.

Johann
Johann is right, if it's the same submodel, rotstep is not a solution. Or you would need to duplicate it...
(2020-09-01, 15:49)Johann Eisner Wrote: [ -> ]Hi

Did you change anything in the matrix?
The correct line for the second callout should be:
1 19 0 -24 0 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 Sub 21002-001.ldr

Philos opinion was you should insert the ROTSTEP command in front of the code in the callout.
Between the header an the first part line..
But this will probably not cause any change, except that the first callout is then also rotated.

Johann

Thanks Johann.
First I used the matrix to rotate the sub part, but the parts in the callout was also rotated. I can not make any changes in the sub part as this will affect the first time the sub part is used.

Regards

Manfred
(2020-09-01, 17:00)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: [ -> ]Johann is right, if it's the same submodel, rotstep is not a solution. Or you would need to duplicate it...

Hello Philippe,

I want to avoid duplicating the sub part.

Regards

Manfred
(2020-09-01, 18:44)Manfred Schäfer Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks Johann.
First I used the matrix to rotate the sub part, but the parts in the callout was also rotated. I can not make any changes in the sub part as this will affect the first time the sub part is used.

Regards

Manfred
Hi Manfred

I can't understand you.
You have only to change the last "1" in the callout line to a "-1" and he callout should be shown correct.
[attachment=5676]

I made a quick project, and it works fine.
[attachment=5677]

Code is attached.
(2020-09-01, 19:02)Johann Eisner Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Manfred

I can't understand you.
You have only to change the last "1" in the callout line to a "-1" and he callout should be shown correct.


I made a quick project, and it works fine.


Code is attached.

Hello Johann,

that is the solution. I included this solution in my project and it works wonderfully.
Many thanks. Smile

Regards

Manfred
Hello,

I have another problem. I would like to insert a part into another part upside down. In this section I want to use a callout. In the following picture you can see the first part.

[attachment=5698]

In the second picture you see the first and the scond part, but the second part with the wrong direction.

[attachment=5699]

The line which call the subpart: 1 1 0 -40 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1.ldr

I hace changed the second "1" (red coloured) in the matrix to "-1". In the next picture you can see the result.

[attachment=5700]

Both parts, the part in the callout and the part in the page was rotated. But I want only rotate the part in the page.
I have attached the code.

My qustions now are:
How looks the matrix that the result is as I wish?
How is the impact of the matrix at the callout?

Regards

Manfred
Pages: 1 2