2022-05-25, 18:40
Pages: 1 2
2022-06-11, 17:57
I noticed a negative color number sneaking in a pbg related to a LDCad bugreport.
It's in the generated pbg for set 8855.
Your output missis the number altogether (2698c01.dat:[color=][count=1]), which somewhere down the line caused a -1 (ldcad bug).
Anyhow I'm assuming the missing number is not how it supposed to be on your side ether.
It's in the generated pbg for set 8855.
Your output missis the number altogether (2698c01.dat:[color=][count=1]), which somewhere down the line caused a -1 (ldcad bug).
Anyhow I'm assuming the missing number is not how it supposed to be on your side ether.
2022-06-11, 18:06
(2022-06-11, 17:57)Roland Melkert Wrote: [ -> ]I noticed a negative color number sneaking in a pbg related to a LDCad bugreport.
It's in the generated pbg for set 8855.
Your output missis the number altogether (2698c01.dat:[color=][count=1]), which somewhere down the line caused a -1 (ldcad bug).
Anyhow I'm assuming the missing number is not how it supposed to be on your side ether.
Thanks for the report. I'll see what going on.
2022-06-11, 18:30
(2022-06-11, 18:06)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for the report. I'll see what going on.
You could actually leave it empty if you want, the bug turned out to be unrelated to the weird color number.
-1 and empty will default to 16.
don't know how the -1 ended up in the file to begin with though.
2022-06-11, 18:51
(2022-06-11, 18:30)Roland Melkert Wrote: [ -> ]You could actually leave it empty if you want, the bug turned out to be unrelated to the weird color number.
-1 and empty will default to 16.
don't know how the -1 ended up in the file to begin with though.
Rebrickable lists the number as -1 because they don't have a color assigned to that part. My script doesn't account for that.
2022-06-12, 2:56
(2022-06-11, 18:06)Orion Pobursky Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for the report. I'll see what going on.
This issue is fixed. The script assumed that the LDraw color number for a part was always defined, this is not the case for some parts. I've altered the code to default to color 0 if the LDraw color is not defined.
2023-04-24, 12:34
Is there some cache needed to be updated somewhere? I ran pbg generator on set 60390 and it reports that part 79736 is missing from PT while I submitted it yesterday...
2023-04-24, 13:07
(2023-04-24, 12:34)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: [ -> ]Is there some cache needed to be updated somewhere? I ran pbg generator on set 60390 and it reports that part 79736 is missing from PT while I submitted it yesterday...
No. It's still using the old PT. I'll see if I can get it updated this week.
2023-07-07, 19:47
I was playing with the generator to update the default set pbg's which come with LDCad releases.
Anyhow I noticed the preview leaves the <items> line out due to html parsing.
This might be a problem when people do a copy/paste (a copy button would be nice too )
Anyhow I noticed the preview leaves the <items> line out due to html parsing.
This might be a problem when people do a copy/paste (a copy button would be nice too )
2023-07-07, 19:55
I have an update on my TODO list since some of the functionality is probably broken at the moment (due to the library move) so I'll keep this in mind when I get to it.
Pages: 1 2