I noticed something's up with 6135.dat—it should fit all the way onto a Technic axle pin (see for example set 8880), but the axle hole isn't deep enough—only 16 LDU, but should be a full stud.
[
attachment=4445]
Unfortunately I don't have this part in real life, so I'm not sure how it would have to be adjusted, but it's clearly not as simple as just extending the axle hole.
(2019-12-14, 4:53)N. W. Perry Wrote: [ -> ]I noticed something's up with 6135.dat—it should fit all the way onto a Technic axle pin (see for example set 8880), but the axle hole isn't deep enough—only 16 LDU, but should be a full stud.
You are painfully right... the stud is misplaced too
There's at least five different designs of this part.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/cat...=2536a#T=C
This picture show only four, but there is also 2536e at Bricklink.
So maybe one of them looks like this and is correct?
And how about that partnumber, 2536? Where does it come from?
Quote:This picture show only four, but there is also 2536e at Bricklink.
So maybe one of them looks like this and is correct?
I have version a/b/d (edit: and c too). Basic geometry looks exactly the same except for longer base. I try to improve that.
Quote:And how about that partnumber, 2536? Where does it come from?
2536 PALM TRUNK
6135 PALM TRUNK W. CROSS
(2019-12-15, 10:12)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: [ -> ]Why two links to the same file, 2563a ?
Because I messed up between 2536 and 2563
Quote:How does this affect the complete palm shortcut?
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c...518c01.dat
Geometry change doesn't affect tree shape, but indeed the shortcut should refer to the new parts, not the obsoletized one.
Quote:Are you still working on the fifth version 2536e? Or is that one simply a "smoother" version of 2536a?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/cat...=2536e#T=C
I don't think it is. Looks like the stud indentations are flat.
No I don't, don't have the part and I don't have enough photo material...