2018-12-21, 15:14
The 2018-02 Parts Update, and many of the most recent updates, have relied heavily upon a small number of reviewers, who assess the submitted parts for completeness, accuracy, compliance to the standards and demonstrate a logical approach to naming and subparting. The numbers of certify reviews by each reviewer on files released in update 2018-02 were as follows:
599 MMR1988
573 MagFors
332 Steffen
327 Philo
68 arezey
52 Holly-Wood
20 GeraldLasser
15 BlackBrick89
9 mikeheide
6 mkennedy
2 theJudeAbides
2 dulcaoin
As with part authoring, this is not a competition, but it would help to reduce the backlog if we could get more active reviewers onboard.
There is no rigid assessment process, but we do expect candiates to have demonstrated authoring skills, show an understanding and acceptance of the Official Library Standards and be able to provide constructive feedback to authors.
Please contact me or reply here if you feel you have these abilities and are able to contribute.
599 MMR1988
573 MagFors
332 Steffen
327 Philo
68 arezey
52 Holly-Wood
20 GeraldLasser
15 BlackBrick89
9 mikeheide
6 mkennedy
2 theJudeAbides
2 dulcaoin
As with part authoring, this is not a competition, but it would help to reduce the backlog if we could get more active reviewers onboard.
There is no rigid assessment process, but we do expect candiates to have demonstrated authoring skills, show an understanding and acceptance of the Official Library Standards and be able to provide constructive feedback to authors.
Please contact me or reply here if you feel you have these abilities and are able to contribute.