Updated: added missing stickers and corrected misplaced parts
[
attachment=7025]
[
attachment=7026]
Currently not OMR compliant (Unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: none
Updated: Rearranged subfiles (Rebuilt the vehicle at upright position and rotate it in final main file)
[
attachment=7032]
[
attachment=7033]
OMR compliant
Missing items: none
(2021-10-24, 12:55)Takeshi Takahashi Wrote: [ -> ]Updated: corrected tyre colour and aligned base plane
The turntable has to be inlined, and the top part moved to the body assembly, so that the top part is rotated together with the body and the digger arm.
(2021-10-24, 14:57)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: [ -> ]The turntable has to be inlined, and the top part moved to the body assembly, so that the top part is rotated together with the body and the digger arm.
Updated, thanks for review. I've overlooked the turntable shortcut.
Updated: Added missing stickers and parts (4208 and 4858)
[
attachment=7055]
[
attachment=7056]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: flexible rope
Normal 4.5V variant, created based on optional 12V variant by Robert
Added missing stickers
[
attachment=7073]
[
attachment=7074]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial parts not inlined)
Missing items: none
Updated: added missing stickers
[
attachment=7086]
[
attachment=7087]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial parts not inlined)
Missing items: flexible hoses
Very nice model and thanks for uploading!!
Updated: corrected tyre colour (0 -> 256 Rubber black), and the sticker was a bit too big (running out of the side surface of winch drum)
[
attachment=7190]
[
attachment=7191]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial sticker not inlined)
Missing items: flexible rope
Updated: Added missing stickers, corrected misplaced/wrong parts
[
attachment=7272]
[
attachment=7273]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: flexible ropes
Updated: Added missing sticker and corrected misplaced parts
[
attachment=7294]
[
attachment=7295]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial sticker not inlined)
Missing items: none
Updated: Added missing sticker, flexible rope and corrected misplaced parts
[
attachment=7300]
[
attachment=7301]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial sticker not inlined)
Missing items: none
Updated: Corrected misplaced parts, updated non-BFC stickers (I've chosen reusing official or certified patterns/prims, rather than rebuilding inlined non-BFC stickers with latest part specs)
[
attachment=7310]
[
attachment=7311]
Currently not OMR compliant (Unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: none
Updated: Added missing stickers and corrected misplaced parts
[
attachment=7327]
[
attachment=7328]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: none
Updated: Added missing stickers and flexible rope
[
attachment=7340]
[
attachment=7341]
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: none
(2022-01-04, 15:04)Takeshi Takahashi Wrote: [ -> ]Missing items: Flexible rope
This is where you can use the one I built for you - and you OMRized.
(2022-01-04, 15:35)Milan Vančura Wrote: [ -> ]This is where you can use the one I built for you - and you OMRized.
Thanks, I've added it along with set 6480.
Updated: Corrected wrong, substituted or misplaced parts/stickers
Known error: Slight (2 LDU on each side, but total 4 LDU = a half plate) collisions between sliding crane base and fixed black inner rail
[
attachment=7342]
[
attachment=7343]
OMR compliant
Missing items: none
I've examined the cause of collisions several times but I couldn't find which part is wrong.
Does the real model rely on plastic flexibility to absorb strain??
(2022-01-05, 12:30)Takeshi Takahashi Wrote: [ -> ]I've examined the cause of collisions several times but I couldn't find which part is wrong.
Does the real model rely on plastic flexibility to absorb strain??
Very often, yes. Although in this case it could also be due to the 0.2 mm size difference between real plates (such as in the crane base and possibly the rails) and their LDraw versions.
You can always apply scaling to a part or assembly if you want visual accuracy, such as for rendering.
(2022-01-05, 14:10)N. W. Perry Wrote: [ -> ]Very often, yes. Although in this case it could also be due to the 0.2 mm size difference between real plates (such as in the crane base and possibly the rails) and their LDraw versions.
You can always apply scaling to a part or assembly if you want visual accuracy, such as for rendering.
Thanks for your advice!!
However, the collision is too much to be explained by the 0.5 LDU thickness difference.
According to the photo, the crane looks like "open jaw" slightly, the strain should be absorbed by rahmen structure of posts and beams.
https://brickset.com/sets/7823-1/Container-Crane-Depot
(2022-01-06, 13:22)Takeshi Takahashi Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for your advice!!
However, the collision is too much to be explained by the 0.5 LDU thickness difference.
According to the photo, the crane looks like "open jaw" slightly, the strain should be absorbed by rahmen structure of posts and beams.
https://brickset.com/sets/7823-1/Container-Crane-Depot
Yes, certainly a combination of the two. The parts have considerable natural flexibility, and then the tiny gap between bricks allows an assembly to bend even a tiny bit more (though this is more pronounced in the horizontal direction).
Either way, scaling is the simplest way to visually correct for this—not that most modelers would or should bother, of course! Theoretically, you could also build accurately-sized parts and combine that with LDCad's flexible generator to hyper-realistically model this bending, but now we're just talking crazy.
(2022-01-02, 13:31)Takeshi Takahashi Wrote: [ -> ]Updated: Added missing stickers and corrected misplaced parts
Currently not OMR compliant (unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: none
Hi Takeshi,
I would just like to take the time to thank you for updating these models, and if I understand correctly you made the stickers as well?
Having made a few digital versions of the OEM stickers for my 80s-90s LDraw models early last year, I appreciate the amount of time and effort it takes to make good quality, digital reproductions of them.
To be honest, mine are simply modified scans of the actual stickers, so unfortunately it is not something worth submitting, but I will see what other contributions I can make to this OMR thread this year.
Thanks again for your fantastic contribution, the stickers really make all the difference.
[
attachment=7356]
[
attachment=7357]
Currently not OMR compliant (Unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: none
This set will be STAMP-free with part 87079, similar to set 6692 :-)
(2022-01-07, 11:50)legolex76 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Takeshi,
I would just like to take the time to thank you for updating these models, and if I understand correctly you made the stickers as well?
Having made a few digital versions of the OEM stickers for my 80s-90s LDraw models early last year, I appreciate the amount of time and effort it takes to make good quality, digital reproductions of them.
To be honest, mine are simply modified scans of the actual stickers, so unfortunately it is not something worth submitting, but I will see what other contributions I can make to this OMR thread this year.
Thanks again for your fantastic contribution, the stickers really make all the difference.
Thanks very much!!
Yes, I've created missing stickers in the models and submitted into the PT.
I thought printed parts are more useful (usually appear in multiple sets and can easily be used in MOCs), but recently I think stickers are also important for the atmosphere of the sets.
The nearest and one-of-biggest barrier for completing 1980's-90's town (trains, boats & Paradisa) will be the larger two boat hulls.
https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-6006.html
I will try to model them, but I need some help (orthogonal pictures, part measurements, etc.).
(2022-01-08, 12:30)Takeshi Takahashi Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks very much!!
Yes, I've created missing stickers in the models and submitted into the PT.
I thought printed parts are more useful (usually appear in multiple sets and can easily be used in MOCs), but recently I think stickers are also important for the atmosphere of the sets.
The nearest and one-of-biggest barrier for completing 1980's-90's town (trains, boats & Paradisa) will be the larger two boat hulls.
https://forums.ldraw.org/thread-6006.html
I will try to model them, but I need some help (orthogonal pictures, part measurements, etc.).
Sigh, unfortunately, I stopped checking that thread a few months after my post. I sold the boats in a hurry and forgot to take the measurements after it turned out that having them scanned would be too expensive. :-( I hope someone else can help out with that one, as I had 4020 and 4030 and would like to have them in a digital collection.
I did however take pictures of all the boxes I had and shared them with
https://www.backoftheboxbuilds.com/ recently. It was a about 200+ sets of various sizes so if you like B-Models as well, keep an eye on that site in the coming months. I might contribute B-Models here as most of the main models are available. Need to look into OMR compliance thing though.
Updated: Added missing (substituted) sticker, corrected misplaced parts
[
attachment=7378]
[
attachment=7379]
Currently not OMR compliant (Unofficial stickers not inlined)
Missing items: none