Could you post a screenshot of the two parts together so we can compare them here?
Then we will decide.
[
attachment=2318]
Filesize 1996x717 (click on the image to get a larger version)
w.
I have to say the left one looks a lot more similar to the original.
(2016-05-27, 20:30)Merlijn Wissink Wrote: [ -> ]I have to say the left one looks a lot more similar to the original.
Me also, you can overwrite my part.
Good job! It was not wasting time.
(2016-05-27, 20:50)Damien Roux Wrote: [ -> ] (2016-05-27, 20:30)Merlijn Wissink Wrote: [ -> ]I have to say the left one looks a lot more similar to the original.
Me also, you can overwrite my part.
Good job! It was not wasting time.
Thanks a lot, but I will not submit until yours has become official. Since it is already certified I guess it will be included in the next update. There is no reason why it shouldn't be used 'til mines goes through the PT.
w.
PS. Working on
http://alpha.bricklink.com/pages/clone/c...color%22:3} which is the last missing western head.
I don't object to Willy's version being more true to that picture, but I would like to see a second picture making sure that the blurred version isn't a misprint.
I've had a good look at some more pictures of this design and I have to say that Willy's version is more correct than Damien's.
The certified part at the PT is even wrong. It is missing the frown between the eyes.
(2018-06-06, 14:58)Willy Tschager Wrote: [ -> ]I DID IT AGAIN (Anybody more stupid than me out there?)! I authored a pattern which is already official:
I did that many times too...
Overall I prefer your version, except for the jagged pseudo text line that I like better in original one.
I agree with Philo.
Please note that there shouldn't be any white area in this pattern, since it is printed on a white tile.