LDraw.org Discussion Forums

Full Version: LDCad tips and tricks
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Rather than burrying this kind of questions in LDCad new version announcement threads I figured out it might be interesting to create a specific thread...
What is the best way to align the links of a chain around gears so that the chain bars go between teeth instead of going through them? I tried to rotate the path points, the whole chain then readjusted the path points to center on the gears, no way... of course I could rotate the gears instead, but since they are linked to other parts of the model I'm not keen of doing this!
[attachment=1981]
What's the best way to properly rotate the connecting rods in a V-engine such as the one below? (question initially asked to me by Max...). It is relatively easy to come to a good solution using a successive approximation method, but maybe there is an easier way?
[attachment=1982]
Just a bit off-topic: Finally I made an AutoCAD drawing to solve this. This way took less than 3 minutes to get the exact angles for this problem. The model is finished, but there wasn't enough time to create the b-model, so the upload will take some more time...
Anyway a built-in solution in LDCad would be pretty cool.

/Max
I think there's a very simple solution to make it easier in LDCad: just a few extra shadow-library parts. Altough, I think (I'm still very new to those 'shadow parts') Roland would need to introduce a few extra commands to create this type of connection. SR3D-Builder did have brick-snapping for these engine parts.

Any possibility to sneak this into 1.5? Wink
There are already connectivity files for engine parts (I made them Wink
The problem is that currently LDCad makes a single connexion at a time, so you can't ensure that piston head is centered in engine block AND connected to rod at the same time.
Exactly - that's another example why I asked for "rotation snap" function. But, you remember, Roland answered he could not know if he would be able to achieve such functionality with current snap functions. So we'll see.
Chain placement can be very demanding especially if you are a perfectionist and or want to have some exact link count etc.

But it should be possible by playing around with the first control point rotation, control point radius-es and adding one or two extra points to force the chain 'hang', like so:

[attachment=1984]

If anyone has an idea on to improve this by e.g. adding extra parameters to the control points or applying some additional magical math I'm open to suggestions.
Improvement on these kinds of part placement is indeed needed.

But you could probably also solve it by using some helper parts combined with the selection info feature, or maybe I could add some kind of additional helper for it. Thinking about this makes me wonder if this is something a scripted plugin system could be helpful for.

Also a set of templates for groups of 2 cylinders at often used angles would probably be a big difference in most builds.
Quote:But it should be possible by playing around with the first control point rotation
I thought so (and it seems quite logical) but I couldn't make it work - maybe I goofed somewhere, I'll try again.
Pages: 1 2