Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: LDMakeList V2.0
February 16, 2013 04:33PM
Hi Roland,

Firstly, Mike will have to answer about why he chose that name, but to me it definitely makes sense to start from %LDRAWDIR%.

Presently the type of slash is system dependent (in principle LDMakeList is OS independent, you just need to change a #define to reverse the slash). But as I recall any valid LDraw code should be able to read either \ or / as a separator for parts. The filename rules for parts are pretty strict to avoid problems. So it shouldn't matter which type is used :)

So the rule is: parts.xml will have the slash of the OS it was created on, and it will always feature trailing slashes to avoid problems with badly defined %LDRAWDIR%.

Tim

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-02-16 04:44PM by Tim Gould.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould1291February 07, 2013 03:09PM
SortParts.pl Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould500February 07, 2013 03:13PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Max Martin Richter464February 07, 2013 03:37PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould466February 07, 2013 03:42PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Max Martin Richter482February 07, 2013 03:54PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould467February 07, 2013 03:55PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Travis Cobbs441February 07, 2013 04:24PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould443February 07, 2013 04:32PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Willy Tschager444February 08, 2013 01:25AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould463February 08, 2013 01:59AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Philippe Hurbain441February 08, 2013 04:55AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould475February 08, 2013 01:48PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann492February 09, 2013 12:58AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould523February 09, 2013 02:31PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann492February 09, 2013 03:12PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould494February 09, 2013 04:16PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann531February 10, 2013 05:21AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould502February 10, 2013 03:00PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann510February 11, 2013 08:28AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann497February 16, 2013 12:40AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann466February 16, 2013 03:27AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould487February 16, 2013 02:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann468February 16, 2013 03:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould488February 16, 2013 04:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann433February 17, 2013 05:46AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert440February 16, 2013 03:50PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould501February 16, 2013 04:33PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann441February 17, 2013 06:19AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert396February 17, 2013 09:33AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann390February 17, 2013 10:10AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould502February 17, 2013 01:49PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Travis Cobbs469February 16, 2013 07:53PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould441February 17, 2013 01:44AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann432February 17, 2013 05:58AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould440February 17, 2013 01:35PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann408February 17, 2013 05:43AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert398February 17, 2013 09:20AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann439February 17, 2013 09:53AM
Update Re: LDMakeList V2.01 Tim Gould476February 23, 2013 02:41PM
Re: Update Re: LDMakeList V2.01 Michael Heidemann534February 23, 2013 11:55PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann412September 06, 2013 01:26PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Tim Gould444September 06, 2013 02:23PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Michael Heidemann433September 06, 2013 02:33PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Magnus Forsberg419September 08, 2013 05:22AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Tim Gould411September 08, 2013 05:40AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Michael Heidemann408September 08, 2013 06:50AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Magnus Forsberg388September 08, 2013 07:06AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Michael Heidemann629September 08, 2013 08:50AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Tim Gould806September 08, 2013 07:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login