Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: LDMakeList V2.0
February 16, 2013 04:33PM
Hi Roland,

Firstly, Mike will have to answer about why he chose that name, but to me it definitely makes sense to start from %LDRAWDIR%.

Presently the type of slash is system dependent (in principle LDMakeList is OS independent, you just need to change a #define to reverse the slash). But as I recall any valid LDraw code should be able to read either \ or / as a separator for parts. The filename rules for parts are pretty strict to avoid problems. So it shouldn't matter which type is used :)

So the rule is: parts.xml will have the slash of the OS it was created on, and it will always feature trailing slashes to avoid problems with badly defined %LDRAWDIR%.

Tim

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-02-16 04:44PM by Tim Gould.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould990February 07, 2013 03:09PM
SortParts.pl Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould387February 07, 2013 03:13PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Max Martin Richter352February 07, 2013 03:37PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould359February 07, 2013 03:42PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Max Martin Richter359February 07, 2013 03:54PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould354February 07, 2013 03:55PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Travis Cobbs352February 07, 2013 04:24PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould339February 07, 2013 04:32PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Willy Tschager328February 08, 2013 01:25AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould357February 08, 2013 01:59AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Philippe Hurbain331February 08, 2013 04:55AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould357February 08, 2013 01:48PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann367February 09, 2013 12:58AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould414February 09, 2013 02:31PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann380February 09, 2013 03:12PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould387February 09, 2013 04:16PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann430February 10, 2013 05:21AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould358February 10, 2013 03:00PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann397February 11, 2013 08:28AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann363February 16, 2013 12:40AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann337February 16, 2013 03:27AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould365February 16, 2013 02:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann348February 16, 2013 03:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould357February 16, 2013 04:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann310February 17, 2013 05:46AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert340February 16, 2013 03:50PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould378February 16, 2013 04:33PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann313February 17, 2013 06:19AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert284February 17, 2013 09:33AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann274February 17, 2013 10:10AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould377February 17, 2013 01:49PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Travis Cobbs360February 16, 2013 07:53PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould324February 17, 2013 01:44AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann317February 17, 2013 05:58AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould318February 17, 2013 01:35PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann307February 17, 2013 05:43AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert268February 17, 2013 09:20AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann329February 17, 2013 09:53AM
Update Re: LDMakeList V2.01 Tim Gould351February 23, 2013 02:41PM
Re: Update Re: LDMakeList V2.01 Michael Heidemann415February 23, 2013 11:55PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann294September 06, 2013 01:26PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Tim Gould299September 06, 2013 02:23PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Michael Heidemann312September 06, 2013 02:33PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Magnus Forsberg294September 08, 2013 05:22AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Tim Gould280September 08, 2013 05:40AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Michael Heidemann290September 08, 2013 06:50AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Magnus Forsberg256September 08, 2013 07:06AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Michael Heidemann459September 08, 2013 08:50AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 Tim Gould480September 08, 2013 07:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login