Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: LDMakeList V2.0
February 09, 2013 04:16PM
Quote
Michael Heidemann
2) For the future I can think of asking the user wheather he likes to use the build in library manager or only the files mentioned in the parts.xml (if i can find such a file). So if in the LDRAWDIR is a file called parts.xml the user is asked: Do you like to proceed with your current settings from parts.xml or define your own settings?.
Something in that way.
If parts.xml is the source, then i only have to build the searchword database and lets go.
Going this way you can choose the layout of the parts.xml just like you want to have it. I can read it.

Just my thought for now.

OK :) I think it makes sense to keep as much the same as possible, but definitely prefer separating the keywords in the .xml file (IMHO Steffen was right). So I'll drop the keywords attribute and use <keyword> sub tags, perhaps inside <keywords> tags.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould260February 07, 2013 03:09PM
SortParts.pl Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould101February 07, 2013 03:13PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Max Martin Richter107February 07, 2013 03:37PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould97February 07, 2013 03:42PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Max Martin Richter92February 07, 2013 03:54PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould96February 07, 2013 03:55PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Travis Cobbs100February 07, 2013 04:24PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould95February 07, 2013 04:32PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Willy Tschager86February 08, 2013 01:25AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould94February 08, 2013 01:59AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Philippe Hurbain89February 08, 2013 04:55AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould102February 08, 2013 01:48PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann101February 09, 2013 12:58AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould98February 09, 2013 02:31PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann84February 09, 2013 03:12PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould100February 09, 2013 04:16PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann116February 10, 2013 05:21AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould107February 10, 2013 03:00PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann128February 11, 2013 08:28AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann98February 16, 2013 12:40AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann90February 16, 2013 03:27AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould94February 16, 2013 02:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann77February 16, 2013 03:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould85February 16, 2013 04:38PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann69February 17, 2013 05:46AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert84February 16, 2013 03:50PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould87February 16, 2013 04:33PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann60February 17, 2013 06:19AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert53February 17, 2013 09:33AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann65February 17, 2013 10:10AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould92February 17, 2013 01:49PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Travis Cobbs92February 16, 2013 07:53PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould76February 17, 2013 01:44AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann63February 17, 2013 05:58AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Tim Gould83February 17, 2013 01:35PM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann75February 17, 2013 05:43AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Roland Melkert47February 17, 2013 09:20AM
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 Michael Heidemann63February 17, 2013 09:53AM
Update Re: LDMakeList V2.01 Tim Gould90February 23, 2013 02:41PM
Re: Update Re: LDMakeList V2.01 Michael Heidemann110February 23, 2013 11:55PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login