Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives
August 18, 2013 08:40AM
Quote
Ben Supnik
We have some folders in parts (s, textures) that are not LODs, and we may have future reasons to add sub-folders to the parts or primitives folder.

If we know that clients only treat sub-folders as LODs when they are told to, I think it will make future expansion of the library less difficult to plan.
I agree, tools should be able to tell what a sub-folder represents. We could either add fixed name configuration file localised to each folder, so long as it does not have a .dat extension or (my preference) add a single file in the ldraw root folder. Does anyone know if any of the tools would whinge if they found a file with an extension that is not .dat in an ldraw folder?

I'm not (yet) convinced of the need for LOD folders for parts, but the inclusion of parts/s/ and parts/textures (when that is implemented in the official library) would allow that.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik610August 13, 2013 05:05PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee315August 13, 2013 10:42PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Magnus Forsberg302August 14, 2013 08:54AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee276August 14, 2013 09:25AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs288August 14, 2013 09:50AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Reuben Pearse333August 28, 2013 01:40PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs337August 28, 2013 02:56PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen304August 15, 2013 01:55AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik286August 16, 2013 02:20PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann271August 17, 2013 04:49AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen259August 17, 2013 06:27AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann247August 17, 2013 08:25AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik307August 17, 2013 09:43AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik270August 17, 2013 10:06AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann229August 17, 2013 11:24AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik271August 17, 2013 04:34PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee286August 18, 2013 12:37AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann274August 18, 2013 01:13AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik302August 18, 2013 08:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee307August 18, 2013 08:40AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo248August 18, 2013 08:52AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen264August 18, 2013 02:02PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik254August 18, 2013 10:39AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Jude Parrill265August 19, 2013 12:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik277August 19, 2013 12:18PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik262August 18, 2013 02:21PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen246August 18, 2013 03:24PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik269August 18, 2013 04:51PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Orion Pobursky220August 20, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith284August 20, 2013 09:26AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik258August 20, 2013 11:38AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert237August 20, 2013 02:44PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee261August 20, 2013 11:07PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo250August 20, 2013 11:52PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee270August 21, 2013 04:29AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik268August 21, 2013 07:24AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo248August 21, 2013 07:39AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik256August 21, 2013 08:33AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo277August 21, 2013 10:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik289August 21, 2013 11:49AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith300August 21, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert233August 21, 2013 02:03PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee249August 21, 2013 10:24PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith245August 22, 2013 10:29AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik294August 22, 2013 12:47PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee264August 22, 2013 11:36PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert257August 23, 2013 08:34AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo271August 24, 2013 02:22AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs241August 22, 2013 01:40PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik246August 21, 2013 07:17AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Tim Gould293August 18, 2013 06:04AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik292August 18, 2013 08:09AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen254August 18, 2013 02:01PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee244August 17, 2013 07:01AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo240August 18, 2013 12:28AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee267August 18, 2013 12:44AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo247August 18, 2013 01:00AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen229August 18, 2013 02:01PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen380September 01, 2013 01:37PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login