Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives
August 18, 2013 08:40AM
Quote
Ben Supnik
We have some folders in parts (s, textures) that are not LODs, and we may have future reasons to add sub-folders to the parts or primitives folder.

If we know that clients only treat sub-folders as LODs when they are told to, I think it will make future expansion of the library less difficult to plan.
I agree, tools should be able to tell what a sub-folder represents. We could either add fixed name configuration file localised to each folder, so long as it does not have a .dat extension or (my preference) add a single file in the ldraw root folder. Does anyone know if any of the tools would whinge if they found a file with an extension that is not .dat in an ldraw folder?

I'm not (yet) convinced of the need for LOD folders for parts, but the inclusion of parts/s/ and parts/textures (when that is implemented in the official library) would allow that.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik665August 13, 2013 05:05PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee342August 13, 2013 10:42PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Magnus Forsberg328August 14, 2013 08:54AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee295August 14, 2013 09:25AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs320August 14, 2013 09:50AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Reuben Pearse358August 28, 2013 01:40PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs362August 28, 2013 02:56PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen332August 15, 2013 01:55AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik314August 16, 2013 02:20PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann315August 17, 2013 04:49AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen295August 17, 2013 06:27AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann273August 17, 2013 08:25AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik336August 17, 2013 09:43AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik297August 17, 2013 10:06AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann269August 17, 2013 11:24AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik302August 17, 2013 04:34PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee330August 18, 2013 12:37AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann304August 18, 2013 01:13AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik333August 18, 2013 08:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee340August 18, 2013 08:40AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo271August 18, 2013 08:52AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen283August 18, 2013 02:02PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik284August 18, 2013 10:39AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Jude Parrill287August 19, 2013 12:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik299August 19, 2013 12:18PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik286August 18, 2013 02:21PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen269August 18, 2013 03:24PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik296August 18, 2013 04:51PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Orion Pobursky245August 20, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith320August 20, 2013 09:26AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik291August 20, 2013 11:38AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert266August 20, 2013 02:44PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee294August 20, 2013 11:07PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo276August 20, 2013 11:52PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee297August 21, 2013 04:29AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik294August 21, 2013 07:24AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo267August 21, 2013 07:39AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik282August 21, 2013 08:33AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo301August 21, 2013 10:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik319August 21, 2013 11:49AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith334August 21, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert259August 21, 2013 02:03PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee267August 21, 2013 10:24PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith262August 22, 2013 10:29AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik313August 22, 2013 12:47PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee293August 22, 2013 11:36PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert275August 23, 2013 08:34AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo298August 24, 2013 02:22AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs259August 22, 2013 01:40PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik264August 21, 2013 07:17AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Tim Gould319August 18, 2013 06:04AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik321August 18, 2013 08:09AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen278August 18, 2013 02:01PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee255August 17, 2013 07:01AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo265August 18, 2013 12:28AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee292August 18, 2013 12:44AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo268August 18, 2013 01:00AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen251August 18, 2013 02:01PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen413September 01, 2013 01:37PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login