Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives
August 18, 2013 08:40AM
Quote
Ben Supnik
We have some folders in parts (s, textures) that are not LODs, and we may have future reasons to add sub-folders to the parts or primitives folder.

If we know that clients only treat sub-folders as LODs when they are told to, I think it will make future expansion of the library less difficult to plan.
I agree, tools should be able to tell what a sub-folder represents. We could either add fixed name configuration file localised to each folder, so long as it does not have a .dat extension or (my preference) add a single file in the ldraw root folder. Does anyone know if any of the tools would whinge if they found a file with an extension that is not .dat in an ldraw folder?

I'm not (yet) convinced of the need for LOD folders for parts, but the inclusion of parts/s/ and parts/textures (when that is implemented in the official library) would allow that.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik466August 13, 2013 05:05PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee225August 13, 2013 10:42PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Magnus Forsberg211August 14, 2013 08:54AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee207August 14, 2013 09:25AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs205August 14, 2013 09:50AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Reuben Pearse240August 28, 2013 01:40PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs256August 28, 2013 02:56PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen226August 15, 2013 01:55AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik198August 16, 2013 02:20PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann185August 17, 2013 04:49AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen183August 17, 2013 06:27AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann181August 17, 2013 08:25AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik203August 17, 2013 09:43AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik192August 17, 2013 10:06AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann162August 17, 2013 11:24AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik179August 17, 2013 04:34PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee194August 18, 2013 12:37AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Michael Heidemann198August 18, 2013 01:13AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik206August 18, 2013 08:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee198August 18, 2013 08:40AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo190August 18, 2013 08:52AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen187August 18, 2013 02:02PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik174August 18, 2013 10:39AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Jude Parrill184August 19, 2013 12:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik200August 19, 2013 12:18PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik185August 18, 2013 02:21PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen178August 18, 2013 03:24PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik172August 18, 2013 04:51PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Orion Pobursky144August 20, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith169August 20, 2013 09:26AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik181August 20, 2013 11:38AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert158August 20, 2013 02:44PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee174August 20, 2013 11:07PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo179August 20, 2013 11:52PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee179August 21, 2013 04:29AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik188August 21, 2013 07:24AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo153August 21, 2013 07:39AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik188August 21, 2013 08:33AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo197August 21, 2013 10:12AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik184August 21, 2013 11:49AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith195August 21, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert163August 21, 2013 02:03PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee180August 21, 2013 10:24PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Allen Smith173August 22, 2013 10:29AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik195August 22, 2013 12:47PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee187August 22, 2013 11:36PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Roland Melkert194August 23, 2013 08:34AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo191August 24, 2013 02:22AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Travis Cobbs166August 22, 2013 01:40PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik170August 21, 2013 07:17AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Tim Gould203August 18, 2013 06:04AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Ben Supnik196August 18, 2013 08:09AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen172August 18, 2013 02:01PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee176August 17, 2013 07:01AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo169August 18, 2013 12:28AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Chris Dee182August 18, 2013 12:44AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Santeri Piippo179August 18, 2013 01:00AM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen157August 18, 2013 02:01PM
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives Steffen261September 01, 2013 01:37PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login