Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices
March 24, 2013 02:13PM
The whole format doesn't make much sense now. But it was invented in the 90s before 3D stuff was really standardised to work on meshes.

Pure rotations can be easily checked as the matrix determinant is one.

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik847March 23, 2013 12:48PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert232March 23, 2013 02:27PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Philippe Hurbain228March 23, 2013 04:02PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould245March 23, 2013 04:14PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik219March 23, 2013 07:29PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould213March 24, 2013 12:06AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik206March 24, 2013 08:46AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould289March 24, 2013 02:13PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert236March 24, 2013 02:24PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould250March 24, 2013 02:33PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik308March 24, 2013 07:44PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Sergio Reano358March 26, 2013 03:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login