Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices
March 24, 2013 02:13PM
The whole format doesn't make much sense now. But it was invented in the 90s before 3D stuff was really standardised to work on meshes.

Pure rotations can be easily checked as the matrix determinant is one.

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik737March 23, 2013 12:48PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert205March 23, 2013 02:27PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Philippe Hurbain216March 23, 2013 04:02PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould212March 23, 2013 04:14PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik199March 23, 2013 07:29PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould199March 24, 2013 12:06AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik191March 24, 2013 08:46AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould264March 24, 2013 02:13PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert215March 24, 2013 02:24PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould226March 24, 2013 02:33PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik273March 24, 2013 07:44PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Sergio Reano339March 26, 2013 03:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login