Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices
March 24, 2013 02:13PM
The whole format doesn't make much sense now. But it was invented in the 90s before 3D stuff was really standardised to work on meshes.

Pure rotations can be easily checked as the matrix determinant is one.

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik745March 23, 2013 12:48PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert207March 23, 2013 02:27PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Philippe Hurbain217March 23, 2013 04:02PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould212March 23, 2013 04:14PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik201March 23, 2013 07:29PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould200March 24, 2013 12:06AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik193March 24, 2013 08:46AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould268March 24, 2013 02:13PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert217March 24, 2013 02:24PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould230March 24, 2013 02:33PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik275March 24, 2013 07:44PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Sergio Reano343March 26, 2013 03:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login