Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices
March 24, 2013 02:13PM
The whole format doesn't make much sense now. But it was invented in the 90s before 3D stuff was really standardised to work on meshes.

Pure rotations can be easily checked as the matrix determinant is one.

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik1004March 23, 2013 12:48PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert289March 23, 2013 02:27PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Philippe Hurbain284March 23, 2013 04:02PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould319March 23, 2013 04:14PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik280March 23, 2013 07:29PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould271March 24, 2013 12:06AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik236March 24, 2013 08:46AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould369March 24, 2013 02:13PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert293March 24, 2013 02:24PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould308March 24, 2013 02:33PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik377March 24, 2013 07:44PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Sergio Reano437March 26, 2013 03:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login