Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices
March 24, 2013 02:13PM
The whole format doesn't make much sense now. But it was invented in the 90s before 3D stuff was really standardised to work on meshes.

Pure rotations can be easily checked as the matrix determinant is one.

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik674March 23, 2013 12:48PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert189March 23, 2013 02:27PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Philippe Hurbain195March 23, 2013 04:02PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould201March 23, 2013 04:14PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik185March 23, 2013 07:29PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould185March 24, 2013 12:06AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik175March 24, 2013 08:46AM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould233March 24, 2013 02:13PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Roland Melkert199March 24, 2013 02:24PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Tim Gould204March 24, 2013 02:33PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Ben Supnik248March 24, 2013 07:44PM
Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices Sergio Reano316March 26, 2013 03:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login