Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: T-Junctions re-visited
March 20, 2013 06:42AM
Hi Travis,

I'm using a related technique: I have a single array of vertices, but they are sorted by a "lexicographal" comparison function (that is, sort by X, if X is equal sort by Y, if Y is equal, sort by Z, etc.).

This gives you similar performance times as the balanced binary tree - NlogN to get the index built (due to sort time) and log-time lookups via a binary search.

The big thing you lose with the array is cheap insertion of "more stuff." But in the case of my code, I know the total vertex count before I even start working (because I have the unsmoothed directive and can count up the triangles and quads and lines) so this is acceptable.

The other thing I discovered is that, given a vertex in the array, it is a bit faster to find the range of equal vertices by linear search (E.g. just walk in both directions in the array) than to do a binary search of the whole sorted array. I chalk this up to locality - more cache hits if the search stays close by. I've been meaning to do a 'step' search - that is, start in the array, walk in units of N vertices, then walk back by N/2, etc. If we start N at a small number like 16 or so, we can find groups of equal value vertices in only a few steps. But...performance profiles indicate that it's a small optimization at this point; the algorithm is currently dominated by the 'big sort' at the beginning.

I'm currently sorting the _entire_ part together -- lines and tris and quads. When I had the lines separate it was faster (it's quicker to sort two small things than one big thing) but I want to have one 'pile' of vertices for snapping things together, so I think one big pile it is.

I think the big win is going to be recursion optimizations, e.g. smooth the stud, recognize in the smoothing process that the stud is "sealed" from other parts and doesn't need to be resmoothed when it is included, then smooth the parent part without the studs. I base this on the fact that (1) my code can detect that the stud is sealed and (2) small parts optimize almost instantly and (3) the big baseplates minus studs have similar vertex counts to small parts. It's a big refactor to actually get the code working this way though; I'm going to finish T junction repair first.

Cheers
Ben
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs880March 11, 2013 10:38PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould465March 11, 2013 11:31PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert411March 12, 2013 11:17AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik423March 12, 2013 11:17AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert395March 12, 2013 11:22AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik379March 12, 2013 11:32AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert371March 12, 2013 11:41AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik382March 12, 2013 11:55AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert378March 13, 2013 10:08AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs403March 13, 2013 11:27AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Allen Smith411March 12, 2013 02:01PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann397March 13, 2013 09:27AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik380March 13, 2013 10:37AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould389March 13, 2013 02:31PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann370March 13, 2013 03:42PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann400March 17, 2013 04:35AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik341March 17, 2013 08:43AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann339March 17, 2013 08:59AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik332March 17, 2013 09:02AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Magnus Forsberg354March 17, 2013 09:15AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs418March 17, 2013 10:09PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik381March 18, 2013 07:30AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs378March 18, 2013 10:57AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik389March 18, 2013 11:27AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs365March 18, 2013 12:23PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik426March 18, 2013 01:41PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert441March 18, 2013 02:51PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs411March 18, 2013 02:59PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert477March 18, 2013 03:41PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik464March 18, 2013 06:09PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert410March 19, 2013 11:38AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik427March 19, 2013 11:43AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert450March 19, 2013 07:07PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs422March 19, 2013 10:13PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould426March 20, 2013 03:56AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs389March 20, 2013 10:13AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik387March 20, 2013 10:23AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs419March 20, 2013 10:29AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs392March 20, 2013 10:26AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik371March 20, 2013 11:18AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik395March 20, 2013 06:42AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert373March 20, 2013 11:36AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Philippe Hurbain400March 20, 2013 06:36AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik437March 20, 2013 06:58AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Allen Smith440March 20, 2013 09:08AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert493March 20, 2013 11:35AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik915March 20, 2013 11:50AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann450March 18, 2013 03:54PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert380March 13, 2013 10:03AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould346March 13, 2013 03:56PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Sergio Reano338March 13, 2013 03:51PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert416March 13, 2013 04:36PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould371March 13, 2013 05:10PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik414March 14, 2013 08:17PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould470March 14, 2013 08:41PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik438March 15, 2013 10:56AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert383March 15, 2013 11:36AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik337March 13, 2013 06:58PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert348March 13, 2013 07:27PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik337March 13, 2013 07:37PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert386March 13, 2013 07:59PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik388March 13, 2013 08:18PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs456March 14, 2013 03:23PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert468March 14, 2013 03:34PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould455March 14, 2013 03:41PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert434March 15, 2013 11:33AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould375March 13, 2013 07:43PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert366March 13, 2013 08:08PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould386March 13, 2013 08:18PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik461March 14, 2013 08:15PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert437March 15, 2013 11:29AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs411March 15, 2013 12:27PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik399March 15, 2013 05:08PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs420March 16, 2013 11:29PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik338March 17, 2013 08:58AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert329March 17, 2013 12:35PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs370March 18, 2013 12:28PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs456March 18, 2013 12:32PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert414March 18, 2013 05:00PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs442March 18, 2013 11:05PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert502March 19, 2013 11:38AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Sergio Reano445March 26, 2013 02:46PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert371March 27, 2013 11:19AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Sergio Reano469March 27, 2013 01:48PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login