Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: T-Junctions re-visited
March 18, 2013 01:41PM
Oh - I understand - it's an orthogonal purpose: to improve the quality of normal generation. (My "flat" statement was just meant as a cheap way to save CPU time by no-oping the smooth on a known flat piece.)

Two thoughts:
1. It may make sense to keep meta extensions that improve processing speed separate from meta extensions that improve normal quality; any time we add logic to make the normals look nicer, it may conflict with all other such extensions, so knowing every extension that can change the normal will be necessary for sanity.

2. If you simplify my scheme by not special-casing all-flat geometry, I've created basically "smooth-self" and "smooth-with-parent". It turns out that you can compute that cheaply and correctly on the fly for at least a few key primitives; when building the connected mesh, a mesh is smooth-self if it has zero edges that are 'open' (meaning connected to neither a line nor another triangle). stud.dat and all groups and rect.dat correctly parse as "sealed" - rect2.dat and rect3.dat parse as unsealed.

Parsing for complex parts like animals can give false "unsealed" results, but this doesn't matter- the key is to identify that heavily used primitives like studs are entirely self-sealed and don't need to be smoothed with their parents.

This means that not only can we create a faster t-junction fixer without meta commands, but the results of the seal test could be used to generate a candidate list of parts to get the META command should we choose to implement it.

3. we've had at least two other proposals for improving normal quality besides noting flat-but-shared normals: allowing the normal to come from a higher-level primitive (specified via a meta command) and allowing explicit normals for some polygons. This makes me think that normal quality, while important, might be orthogonal to the overall algorithmic problems (e.g. given no meta commands, can we come up with decent normals quickly).

cheers
ben
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs665March 11, 2013 10:38PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould312March 11, 2013 11:31PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert302March 12, 2013 11:17AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik303March 12, 2013 11:17AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert280March 12, 2013 11:22AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik284March 12, 2013 11:32AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert269March 12, 2013 11:41AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik285March 12, 2013 11:55AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert285March 13, 2013 10:08AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs298March 13, 2013 11:27AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Allen Smith316March 12, 2013 02:01PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann282March 13, 2013 09:27AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik283March 13, 2013 10:37AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould279March 13, 2013 02:31PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann274March 13, 2013 03:42PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann283March 17, 2013 04:35AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik252March 17, 2013 08:43AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann250March 17, 2013 08:59AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik257March 17, 2013 09:02AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Magnus Forsberg248March 17, 2013 09:15AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs328March 17, 2013 10:09PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik281March 18, 2013 07:30AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs291March 18, 2013 10:57AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik298March 18, 2013 11:27AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs282March 18, 2013 12:23PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik300March 18, 2013 01:41PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert312March 18, 2013 02:51PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs279March 18, 2013 02:59PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert325March 18, 2013 03:41PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik310March 18, 2013 06:09PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert301March 19, 2013 11:38AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik323March 19, 2013 11:43AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert333March 19, 2013 07:07PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs310March 19, 2013 10:13PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould292March 20, 2013 03:56AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs283March 20, 2013 10:13AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik272March 20, 2013 10:23AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs280March 20, 2013 10:29AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs287March 20, 2013 10:26AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik267March 20, 2013 11:18AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik282March 20, 2013 06:42AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert273March 20, 2013 11:36AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Philippe Hurbain277March 20, 2013 06:36AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik301March 20, 2013 06:58AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Allen Smith299March 20, 2013 09:08AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert301March 20, 2013 11:35AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik699March 20, 2013 11:50AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Michael Heidemann300March 18, 2013 03:54PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert273March 13, 2013 10:03AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould252March 13, 2013 03:56PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Sergio Reano263March 13, 2013 03:51PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert323March 13, 2013 04:36PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould290March 13, 2013 05:10PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik274March 14, 2013 08:17PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould338March 14, 2013 08:41PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik331March 15, 2013 10:56AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert281March 15, 2013 11:36AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik251March 13, 2013 06:58PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert267March 13, 2013 07:27PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik245March 13, 2013 07:37PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert265March 13, 2013 07:59PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik293March 13, 2013 08:18PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs311March 14, 2013 03:23PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert327March 14, 2013 03:34PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould340March 14, 2013 03:41PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert309March 15, 2013 11:33AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould268March 13, 2013 07:43PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert260March 13, 2013 08:08PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Tim Gould265March 13, 2013 08:18PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik329March 14, 2013 08:15PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert322March 15, 2013 11:29AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs290March 15, 2013 12:27PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik312March 15, 2013 05:08PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs299March 16, 2013 11:29PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Ben Supnik247March 17, 2013 08:58AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert250March 17, 2013 12:35PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs279March 18, 2013 12:28PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs315March 18, 2013 12:32PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert290March 18, 2013 05:00PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Travis Cobbs328March 18, 2013 11:05PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert345March 19, 2013 11:38AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Sergio Reano333March 26, 2013 02:46PM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Roland Melkert279March 27, 2013 11:19AM
Re: T-Junctions re-visited Sergio Reano333March 27, 2013 01:48PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login