Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict?
avatarJanuary 16, 2013 06:53PM
Note: in my text below, "NULL comment" means a 0 on a line all by itself.

This was discussed in early 2008 by the 2007/2008 LSC, when Chris Dee (as Part Admin, not LSC member) asked if we really wanted to disallow NULL comments, in particular regarding the one that shows up at the end of many part files. The only person in the LSC that said anything (William Howard) stated that he felt the final one should either be disallowed (which is what happened), or it should be required in all LDraw files (which he didn't feel was practical). No one else on the LSC commented further on that issue (as far as I can tell). In my personal case I believe this was because I didn't care either way, and presumably in the case of the other members it was either because they didn't care, or didn't like NULL comments.

We as an LSC were definitely aware that we were disallowing NULL comment lines in official part files, though.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs799March 10, 2012 01:07AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould373March 10, 2012 01:26AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson338March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith344March 10, 2012 01:52PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson308March 10, 2012 03:12PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen290March 10, 2012 04:22PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann218January 15, 2013 11:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs188January 16, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen205January 16, 2013 11:40AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith241January 16, 2013 11:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen244January 16, 2013 11:59AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky216January 16, 2013 01:48PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs238January 16, 2013 02:03PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen230January 16, 2013 04:11PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs238January 16, 2013 06:53PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen236January 17, 2013 12:42AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Max Martin Richter216January 17, 2013 12:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann221January 17, 2013 12:34PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky227January 17, 2013 01:25PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain230January 18, 2013 12:36AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann184January 18, 2013 08:50AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann347January 18, 2013 01:27PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky319March 10, 2012 02:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould278March 10, 2012 02:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson310March 10, 2012 03:18PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Willy Tschager351March 10, 2012 04:22AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould302March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain295March 10, 2012 11:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen298March 11, 2012 06:49AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky279March 11, 2012 10:23AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould258March 11, 2012 11:17AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs288March 11, 2012 10:29PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain346March 10, 2012 05:05AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson310March 10, 2012 12:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould315March 10, 2012 12:47PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen313March 10, 2012 11:13AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Jude Parrill286March 11, 2012 12:51AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs307March 11, 2012 10:39PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee344March 11, 2012 11:01PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen287March 12, 2012 02:16PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee289March 13, 2012 03:33PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith290March 19, 2012 09:59PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee298March 20, 2012 09:57AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith274March 20, 2012 07:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould276March 20, 2012 07:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen267March 20, 2012 08:04PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen291March 20, 2012 12:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft276April 10, 2012 10:56PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould259April 10, 2012 11:10PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft309June 21, 2012 01:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen295April 11, 2012 04:19PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould283April 11, 2012 05:05PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky304April 11, 2012 05:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login