Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict?
avatarJanuary 16, 2013 06:53PM
Note: in my text below, "NULL comment" means a 0 on a line all by itself.

This was discussed in early 2008 by the 2007/2008 LSC, when Chris Dee (as Part Admin, not LSC member) asked if we really wanted to disallow NULL comments, in particular regarding the one that shows up at the end of many part files. The only person in the LSC that said anything (William Howard) stated that he felt the final one should either be disallowed (which is what happened), or it should be required in all LDraw files (which he didn't feel was practical). No one else on the LSC commented further on that issue (as far as I can tell). In my personal case I believe this was because I didn't care either way, and presumably in the case of the other members it was either because they didn't care, or didn't like NULL comments.

We as an LSC were definitely aware that we were disallowing NULL comment lines in official part files, though.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs919March 10, 2012 01:07AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould424March 10, 2012 01:26AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson394March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith388March 10, 2012 01:52PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson349March 10, 2012 03:12PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen340March 10, 2012 04:22PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann265January 15, 2013 11:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs233January 16, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen248January 16, 2013 11:40AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith294January 16, 2013 11:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen315January 16, 2013 11:59AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky275January 16, 2013 01:48PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs307January 16, 2013 02:03PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen291January 16, 2013 04:11PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs291January 16, 2013 06:53PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen299January 17, 2013 12:42AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Max Martin Richter263January 17, 2013 12:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann280January 17, 2013 12:34PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky293January 17, 2013 01:25PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain294January 18, 2013 12:36AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann220January 18, 2013 08:50AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann428January 18, 2013 01:27PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky369March 10, 2012 02:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould325March 10, 2012 02:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson355March 10, 2012 03:18PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Willy Tschager394March 10, 2012 04:22AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould344March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain340March 10, 2012 11:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen360March 11, 2012 06:49AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky323March 11, 2012 10:23AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould305March 11, 2012 11:17AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs335March 11, 2012 10:29PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain401March 10, 2012 05:05AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson372March 10, 2012 12:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould357March 10, 2012 12:47PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen362March 10, 2012 11:13AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Jude Parrill327March 11, 2012 12:51AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs353March 11, 2012 10:39PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee383March 11, 2012 11:01PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen325March 12, 2012 02:16PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee329March 13, 2012 03:33PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith330March 19, 2012 09:59PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee340March 20, 2012 09:57AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith324March 20, 2012 07:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould319March 20, 2012 07:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen304March 20, 2012 08:04PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen341March 20, 2012 12:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft327April 10, 2012 10:56PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould302April 10, 2012 11:10PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft362June 21, 2012 01:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen380April 11, 2012 04:19PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould332April 11, 2012 05:05PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky371April 11, 2012 05:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login