Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict?
avatarJanuary 16, 2013 06:53PM
Note: in my text below, "NULL comment" means a 0 on a line all by itself.

This was discussed in early 2008 by the 2007/2008 LSC, when Chris Dee (as Part Admin, not LSC member) asked if we really wanted to disallow NULL comments, in particular regarding the one that shows up at the end of many part files. The only person in the LSC that said anything (William Howard) stated that he felt the final one should either be disallowed (which is what happened), or it should be required in all LDraw files (which he didn't feel was practical). No one else on the LSC commented further on that issue (as far as I can tell). In my personal case I believe this was because I didn't care either way, and presumably in the case of the other members it was either because they didn't care, or didn't like NULL comments.

We as an LSC were definitely aware that we were disallowing NULL comment lines in official part files, though.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs773March 10, 2012 01:07AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould358March 10, 2012 01:26AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson319March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith330March 10, 2012 01:52PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson297March 10, 2012 03:12PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen273March 10, 2012 04:22PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann205January 15, 2013 11:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs175January 16, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen194January 16, 2013 11:40AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith220January 16, 2013 11:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen224January 16, 2013 11:59AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky197January 16, 2013 01:48PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs218January 16, 2013 02:03PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen210January 16, 2013 04:11PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs218January 16, 2013 06:53PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen220January 17, 2013 12:42AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Max Martin Richter204January 17, 2013 12:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann203January 17, 2013 12:34PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky211January 17, 2013 01:25PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain212January 18, 2013 12:36AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann171January 18, 2013 08:50AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann328January 18, 2013 01:27PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky297March 10, 2012 02:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould262March 10, 2012 02:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson286March 10, 2012 03:18PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Willy Tschager337March 10, 2012 04:22AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould289March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain277March 10, 2012 11:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen283March 11, 2012 06:49AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky262March 11, 2012 10:23AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould245March 11, 2012 11:17AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs272March 11, 2012 10:29PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain333March 10, 2012 05:05AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson296March 10, 2012 12:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould276March 10, 2012 12:47PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen299March 10, 2012 11:13AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Jude Parrill271March 11, 2012 12:51AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs293March 11, 2012 10:39PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee330March 11, 2012 11:01PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen275March 12, 2012 02:16PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee277March 13, 2012 03:33PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith275March 19, 2012 09:59PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee289March 20, 2012 09:57AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith255March 20, 2012 07:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould260March 20, 2012 07:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen252March 20, 2012 08:04PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen281March 20, 2012 12:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft261April 10, 2012 10:56PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould243April 10, 2012 11:10PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft298June 21, 2012 01:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen278April 11, 2012 04:19PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould274April 11, 2012 05:05PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky289April 11, 2012 05:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login