Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict?
avatarJanuary 16, 2013 06:53PM
Note: in my text below, "NULL comment" means a 0 on a line all by itself.

This was discussed in early 2008 by the 2007/2008 LSC, when Chris Dee (as Part Admin, not LSC member) asked if we really wanted to disallow NULL comments, in particular regarding the one that shows up at the end of many part files. The only person in the LSC that said anything (William Howard) stated that he felt the final one should either be disallowed (which is what happened), or it should be required in all LDraw files (which he didn't feel was practical). No one else on the LSC commented further on that issue (as far as I can tell). In my personal case I believe this was because I didn't care either way, and presumably in the case of the other members it was either because they didn't care, or didn't like NULL comments.

We as an LSC were definitely aware that we were disallowing NULL comment lines in official part files, though.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs979March 10, 2012 01:07AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould460March 10, 2012 01:26AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson444March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith419March 10, 2012 01:52PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson397March 10, 2012 03:12PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen391March 10, 2012 04:22PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann302January 15, 2013 11:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs263January 16, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen275January 16, 2013 11:40AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith328January 16, 2013 11:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen364January 16, 2013 11:59AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky319January 16, 2013 01:48PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs347January 16, 2013 02:03PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen328January 16, 2013 04:11PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs328January 16, 2013 06:53PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen341January 17, 2013 12:42AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Max Martin Richter294January 17, 2013 12:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann318January 17, 2013 12:34PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky332January 17, 2013 01:25PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain337January 18, 2013 12:36AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann257January 18, 2013 08:50AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann469January 18, 2013 01:27PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky405March 10, 2012 02:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould356March 10, 2012 02:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson390March 10, 2012 03:18PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Willy Tschager413March 10, 2012 04:22AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould377March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain370March 10, 2012 11:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen388March 11, 2012 06:49AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky358March 11, 2012 10:23AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould330March 11, 2012 11:17AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs358March 11, 2012 10:29PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain424March 10, 2012 05:05AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson407March 10, 2012 12:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould382March 10, 2012 12:47PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen380March 10, 2012 11:13AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Jude Parrill361March 11, 2012 12:51AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs386March 11, 2012 10:39PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee417March 11, 2012 11:01PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen355March 12, 2012 02:16PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee369March 13, 2012 03:33PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith380March 19, 2012 09:59PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee377March 20, 2012 09:57AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith351March 20, 2012 07:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould351March 20, 2012 07:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen343March 20, 2012 08:04PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen385March 20, 2012 12:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft359April 10, 2012 10:56PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould338April 10, 2012 11:10PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft389June 21, 2012 01:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen412April 11, 2012 04:19PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould361April 11, 2012 05:05PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky407April 11, 2012 05:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login