Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict?
avatarJanuary 16, 2013 06:53PM
Note: in my text below, "NULL comment" means a 0 on a line all by itself.

This was discussed in early 2008 by the 2007/2008 LSC, when Chris Dee (as Part Admin, not LSC member) asked if we really wanted to disallow NULL comments, in particular regarding the one that shows up at the end of many part files. The only person in the LSC that said anything (William Howard) stated that he felt the final one should either be disallowed (which is what happened), or it should be required in all LDraw files (which he didn't feel was practical). No one else on the LSC commented further on that issue (as far as I can tell). In my personal case I believe this was because I didn't care either way, and presumably in the case of the other members it was either because they didn't care, or didn't like NULL comments.

We as an LSC were definitely aware that we were disallowing NULL comment lines in official part files, though.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs960March 10, 2012 01:07AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould449March 10, 2012 01:26AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson432March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith410March 10, 2012 01:52PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson386March 10, 2012 03:12PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen371March 10, 2012 04:22PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann286January 15, 2013 11:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs254January 16, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen265January 16, 2013 11:40AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith318January 16, 2013 11:56AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen349January 16, 2013 11:59AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky305January 16, 2013 01:48PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs341January 16, 2013 02:03PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen315January 16, 2013 04:11PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs320January 16, 2013 06:53PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen332January 17, 2013 12:42AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Max Martin Richter283January 17, 2013 12:06AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann303January 17, 2013 12:34PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky322January 17, 2013 01:25PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain322January 18, 2013 12:36AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann245January 18, 2013 08:50AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Michael Heidemann463January 18, 2013 01:27PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky396March 10, 2012 02:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould347March 10, 2012 02:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson384March 10, 2012 03:18PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Willy Tschager410March 10, 2012 04:22AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould367March 10, 2012 11:43AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain365March 10, 2012 11:32PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen377March 11, 2012 06:49AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky346March 11, 2012 10:23AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould321March 11, 2012 11:17AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs353March 11, 2012 10:29PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Philippe Hurbain417March 10, 2012 05:05AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tore Eriksson401March 10, 2012 12:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould376March 10, 2012 12:47PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen375March 10, 2012 11:13AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Jude Parrill350March 11, 2012 12:51AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Travis Cobbs377March 11, 2012 10:39PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee409March 11, 2012 11:01PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen345March 12, 2012 02:16PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee351March 13, 2012 03:33PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith363March 19, 2012 09:59PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Chris Dee361March 20, 2012 09:57AM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Allen Smith345March 20, 2012 07:30PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould343March 20, 2012 07:55PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen335March 20, 2012 08:04PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen374March 20, 2012 12:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft348April 10, 2012 10:56PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould326April 10, 2012 11:10PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Greg Teft380June 21, 2012 01:21PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Steffen402April 11, 2012 04:19PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Tim Gould350April 11, 2012 05:05PM
Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? Orion Pobursky400April 11, 2012 05:28PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login