Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee929February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould272February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill282February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee278February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager255February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain251February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee260February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould261February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain261February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen240February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee252February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen271February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee225February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen233February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee433February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen296May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee149August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould143August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager143August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee141August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager147August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith146August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould134August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee129August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee127August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain127August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun121August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee117August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg143August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould106August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain123August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen114September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee95September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen101September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain135September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen125September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann115October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee119October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann109October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee169October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain149August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith240April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee238April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith267April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs244April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee262May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert236May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee255May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert341May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould245May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg259February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee252February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen256February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager250April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee236April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager264April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login