Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee972February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould305February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill321February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee304February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager288February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain284February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee295February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould301February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain296February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen265February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee278February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen310February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee255February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen262February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee459February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen328May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee190August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould184August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager183August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee173August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager199August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith187August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould162August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee168August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee161August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain160August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun155August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee149August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg179August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould140August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain147August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen161September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee132September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen141September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain164September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen174September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann147October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee150October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann148October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee219October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain196August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith271April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee274April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith291April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs273April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee296May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert274May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee282May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert376May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould279May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg297February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee285February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen281February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager288April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee272April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager287April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login