Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1096February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould407February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill400February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee386February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager374February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain378February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee404February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould406February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain382February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen346February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee357February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen400February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee360February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen348February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee537February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen414May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee296August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould286August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager276August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee255August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager302August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith273August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould245August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee247August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee242August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain240August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun249August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee236August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg277August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould223August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain242August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen252September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee222September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen215September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain252September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen272September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann261October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee290October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann259October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee366October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain302August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith321April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee345April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith379April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs354April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee407May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert351May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee373May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert449May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould377May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg511February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee366February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen366February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager374April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee366April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager356April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login