Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1177February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould454February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill450February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee432February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager410February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain434February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee458February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould458February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain432February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen395February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee409February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen456February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee408February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen398February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee583February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen452May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee343August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould352August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager321August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee313August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager369August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith326August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould293August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee300August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee286August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain299August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun298August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee281August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg333August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould278August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain297August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen309September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee273September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen271September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain300September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen339September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann358October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee372October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann341October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee465October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain362August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith351April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee388April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith438April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs406April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee457May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert399May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee432May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert498May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould437May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg909February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee417February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen417February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager421April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee410April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager407April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login