Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1126February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould428February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill417February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee408February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager389February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain406February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee427February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould431February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain406February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen369February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee378February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen430February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee383February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen369February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee553February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen426May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee316August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould315August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager296August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee288August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager327August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith296August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould263August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee271August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee259August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain273August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun270August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee253August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg310August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould247August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain266August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen276September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee249September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen247September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain267September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen298September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann299October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee312October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann294October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee409October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain332August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith331April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee369April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith409April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs375April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee434May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert373May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee397May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert471May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould403May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg813February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee391February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen388February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager394April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee389April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager377April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login