Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1025February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould346February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill350February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee336February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager321February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain319February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee331February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould341February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain325February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen300February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee310February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen349February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee290February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen302February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee491February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen362May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee222August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould219August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager222August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee198August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager229August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith220August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould193August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee205August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee191August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain195August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun192August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee185August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg217August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould171August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain179August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen196September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee165September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen173September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain201September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen205September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann181October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee197October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann188October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee279October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain242August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith289April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee303April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith323April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs307April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee338May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert305May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee322May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert407May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould319May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg322February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee320February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen316February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager324April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee312April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager321April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login