Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1115February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould419February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill412February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee403February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager384February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain391February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee418February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould423February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain398February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen361February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee369February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen423February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee373February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen361February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee549February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen424May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee313August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould299August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager290August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee281August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager316August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith286August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould258August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee260August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee253August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain255August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun261August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee249August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg298August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould242August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain257August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen270September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee238September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen236September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain262September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen285September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann282October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee301October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann282October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee396October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain319August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith326April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee359April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith399April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs369April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee418May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert367May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee391May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert467May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould395May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg532February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee384February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen379February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager389April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee379April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager372April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login