Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1197February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould464February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill464February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee444February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager423February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain455February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee472February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould469February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain441February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen405February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee417February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen470February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee418February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen408February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee593February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen465May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee360August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould372August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager341August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee329August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager384August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith340August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould312August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee314August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee300August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain309August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun314August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee294August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg350August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould299August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain323August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen322September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee286September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen284September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain315September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen359September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann380October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee394October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann355October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee487October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain376August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith370April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee399April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith451April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs413April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee469May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert408May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee448May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert509May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould452May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg928February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee432February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen428February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager435April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee421April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager416April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login