Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1056February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould372February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill371February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee355February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager346February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain337February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee353February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould360February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain346February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen320February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee330February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen368February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee321February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen317February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee509February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen381May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee249August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould245August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager239August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee224August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager254August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith241August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould217August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee223August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee210August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain213August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun211August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee209August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg239August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould192August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain208August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen219September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee189September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen189September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain227September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen241September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann217October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee230October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann221October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee313October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain261August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith300April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee323April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith347April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs326April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee362May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert330May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee341May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert422May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould338May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg342February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee339February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen336February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager346April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee333April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager336April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login