Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee969February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould304February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill320February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee304February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager286February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain282February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee293February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould300February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain293February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen263February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee277February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen309February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee255February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen261February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee458February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen328May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee189August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould182August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager183August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee173August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager198August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith186August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould162August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee166August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee161August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain158August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun155August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee147August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg178August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould138August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain145August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen158September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee131September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen140September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain162September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen170September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann144October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee148October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann147October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee218October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain192August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith270April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee274April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith290April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs270April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee295May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert273May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee281May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert375May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould279May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg296February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee281February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen281February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager286April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee271April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager287April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login