Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 04, 2013 12:26AM
For the record, the version of LDMakeList that will ship with the new AIOI (available here) can remove aliases based on their definition as an alias part without resorting to prefixes (-a option).

It can also strip the '=' sign from the alias parts if you go down that route (-i= option).

Tim
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1029February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould348February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill355February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee338February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager324February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain324February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee331February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould346February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain328February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen304February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee315February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen351February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee291February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen303February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee493February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen365May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee224August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould222August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager224August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee201August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager233August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith223August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould194August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee208August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee196August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain197August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun194August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee190August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg217August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould174August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain181August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen197September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee166September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen176September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain204September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen214September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann184October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee200October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann192October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee282October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain244August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith290April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee307April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith328April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs309April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee341May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert308May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee324May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert411May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould320May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg326February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee323February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen320February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager329April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee314April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager321April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login