Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1160February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould443February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill435February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee420February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager397February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain424February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee443February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould448February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain419February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen381February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee395February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen445February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee393February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen382February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee572February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen438May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee329August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould342August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager311August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee298August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager355August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith313August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould278August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee287August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee274August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain287August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun287August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee268August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg321August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould262August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain287August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen293September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee260September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen260September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain282September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen319September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann339October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee347October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann321October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee450October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain349August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith339April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee377April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith424April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs394April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee444May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert383May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee413May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert487May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould422May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg895February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee409February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen401February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager410April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee399April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager399April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login