Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1219February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould475February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill479February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee454February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager436February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain462February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee479February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould481February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain452February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen413February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee422February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen481February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee426February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen416February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee604February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen473May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee375August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould384August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager353August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee340August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager396August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith353August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould321August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee327August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee316August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain316August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun329August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee308August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg365August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould317August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain343August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen337September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee298September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen299September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain324September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen376September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann413October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee416October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann378October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee513October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain394August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith378April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee407April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith458April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs416April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee482May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert418May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee456May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert521May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould462May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg951February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee438February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen436February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager446April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee429April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager425April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login