Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1115February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould421February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill413February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee403February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager385February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain392February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee421February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould423February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain399February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen362February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee369February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen423February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee373February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen362February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee550February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen424May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee313August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould301August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager290August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee281August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager316August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith287August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould258August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee261August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee254August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain256August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun261August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee249August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg300August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould242August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain258August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen270September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee238September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen236September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain262September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen285September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann283October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee302October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann284October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee397October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain320August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith326April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee360April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith399April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs369April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee418May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert367May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee392May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert467May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould395May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg583February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee386February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen379February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager389April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee380April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager373April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login