Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1340February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould557February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill561February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee535February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager512February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain547February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee551February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould568February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain530February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen500February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee505February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen569February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee498February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen489February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee689February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen547May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee466August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould475August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager438August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee427August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager475August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith435August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould405August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee416August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee415August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain408August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun419August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee384August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg474August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould412August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain428August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen440September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee401September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen392September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain412September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen491September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann555October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee535October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann512October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee685October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain490August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith445April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee476April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith531April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs489April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee557May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert503May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee573May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert616May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould567May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg1058February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee532February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen522February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager518April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee513April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager505April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login