Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1235February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould482February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill490February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee462February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager446February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain476February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee485February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould492February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain469February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen423February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee433February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen496February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee433February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen422February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee615February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen482May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee386August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould399August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager362August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee351August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager408August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith365August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould328August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee344August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee328August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain332August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun335August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee323August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg382August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould326August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain354August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen355September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee311September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen314September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain339September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen401September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann444October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee436October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann411October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee545October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain414August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith382April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee414April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith477April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs430April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee492May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert434May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee473May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert540May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould476May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg960February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee451February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen447February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager452April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee441April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager436April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login