Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee984February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould318February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill332February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee316February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager300February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain298February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee311February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould314February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain307February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen275February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee289February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen317February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee267February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen270February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee471February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen335May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee198August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould187August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager187August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee177August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager207August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith196August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould171August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee181August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee170August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain171August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun167August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee157August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg189August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould154August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain152August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen171September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee140September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen154September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain173September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen183September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann155October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee165October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann162October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee238October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain211August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith275April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee285April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith298April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs280April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee308May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert285May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee289May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert388May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould295May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg303February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee296February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen288February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager297April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee284April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager299April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login