Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1096February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould407February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill398February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee386February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager374February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain378February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee403February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould406February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain381February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen346February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee357February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen399February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee359February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen348February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee537February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen414May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee294August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould286August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager275August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee254August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager301August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith273August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould245August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee247August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee241August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain240August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun249August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee236August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg276August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould223August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain241August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen252September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee221September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen214September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain252September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen271September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann260October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee290October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann259October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee365October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain302August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith321April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee345April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith379April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs354April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee406May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert351May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee372May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert449May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould377May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg510February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee366February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen366February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager374April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee366April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager356April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login