Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1054February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould372February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill370February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee355February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager345February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain336February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee349February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould358February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain343February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen318February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee328February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen367February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee317February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen316February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee509February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen380May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee245August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould241August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager238August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee223August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager253August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith239August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould215August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee223August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee209August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain212August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun209August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee206August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg238August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould190August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain207August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen216September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee186September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen187September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain222September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen237September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann213October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee228October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann216October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee308October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain259August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith300April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee322April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith345April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs325April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee360May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert329May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee341May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert422May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould337May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg340February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee339February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen334February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager343April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee333April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager334April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login