Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1017February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould342February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill349February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee335February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager318February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain316February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee328February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould337February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain324February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen298February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee308February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen347February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee287February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen297February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee489February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen360May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee221August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould217August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager219August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee196August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager226August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith215August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould192August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee203August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee190August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain192August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun189August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee182August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg215August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould169August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain174August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen196September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee162September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen172September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain198September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen205September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann181October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee194October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann185October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee274October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain241August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith288April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee302April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith321April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs305April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee336May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert302May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee317May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert406May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould318May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg321February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee317February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen313February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager320April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee310April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager317April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login