Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1158February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould441February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill435February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee419February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager397February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain423February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee443February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould448February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain419February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen381February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee395February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen444February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee392February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen382February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee570February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen438May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee329August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould341August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager308August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee298August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager355August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith312August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould278August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee285August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee274August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain287August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun287August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee267August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg320August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould262August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain282August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen292September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee259September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen260September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain282September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen316September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann333October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee345October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann319October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee449October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain349August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith338April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee377April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith423April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs394April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee444May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert383May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee411May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert486May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould421May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg894February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee409February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen400February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager409April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee399April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager399April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login