Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee966February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould303February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill317February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee304February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager285February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain281February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee291February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould295February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain293February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen262February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee277February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen307February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee252February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen261February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee458February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen327May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee187August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould180August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager181August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee172August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager195August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith185August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould161August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee165August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee159August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain158August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun155August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee147August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg177August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould138August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain144August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen157September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee131September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen139September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain162September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen168September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann142October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee146October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann146October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee218October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain191August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith270April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee273April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith290April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs270April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee293May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert270May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee280May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert375May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould279May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg291February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee280February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen279February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager286April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee271April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager286April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login