Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee984February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould318February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill332February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee316February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager300February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain298February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee311February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould314February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain307February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen275February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee289February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen317February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee267February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen270February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee471February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen335May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee198August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould187August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager187August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee177August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager207August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith196August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould171August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee181August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee170August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain171August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun167August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee157August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg189August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould154August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain152August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen171September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee140September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen154September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain173September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen183September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann154October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee165October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann162October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee238October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain211August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith275April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee284April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith298April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs280April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee308May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert285May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee289May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert388May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould295May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg303February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee296February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen287February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager297April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee284April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager299April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login