Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1340February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould557February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill561February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee535February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager513February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain548February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee551February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould568February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain531February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen500February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee507February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen569February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee498February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen489February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee689February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen549May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee468August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould475August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager438August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee429August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager475August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith439August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould405August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee416August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee416August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain408August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun419August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee385August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg475August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould412August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain428August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen440September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee401September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen392September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain412September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen493September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann555October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee535October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann512October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee685October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain490August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith445April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee476April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith532April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs490April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee558May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert503May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee574May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert618May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould568May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg1058February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee532February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen522February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager518April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee513April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager505April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login