Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1029February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould348February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill355February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee338February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager324February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain322February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee331February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould344February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain328February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen303February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee314February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen351February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee290February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen303February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee493February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen365May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee224August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould222August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager223August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee200August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager233August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith221August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould194August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee208August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee196August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain197August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun194August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee189August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg217August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould174August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain181August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen197September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee166September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen176September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain203September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen212September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann183October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee199October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann190October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee281October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain244August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith290April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee307April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith328April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs309April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee341May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert307May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee323May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert410May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould320May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg325February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee323February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen319February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager327April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee314April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager321April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login