Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1035February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould354February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill357February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee341February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager328February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain328February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee334February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould348February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain332February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen307February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee319February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen355February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee295February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen307February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee497February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen369May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee228August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould230August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager225August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee208August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager239August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith225August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould196August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee210August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee199August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain200August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun196August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee192August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg220August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould180August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain183August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen199September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee168September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen181September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain209September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen218September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann195October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee206October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann194October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee289October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain246August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith293April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee308April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith331April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs314April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee343May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert312May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee325May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert413May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould324May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg330February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee325February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen324February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager330April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee318April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager324April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login