Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee961February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould297February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill312February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee299February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager280February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain277February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee282February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould285February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain287February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen261February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee272February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen298February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee249February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen258February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee452February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen320May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee181August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould175August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager178August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee167August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager185August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith176August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould157August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee157August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee156August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain151August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun150August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee144August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg174August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould132August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain141August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen148September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee124September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen132September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain156September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen162September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann139October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee143October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann138October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee211October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain179August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith261April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee265April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith286April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs269April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee288May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert258May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee274May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert366May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould272May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg288February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee274February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen275February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager283April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee267April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager280April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login