Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1015February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould341February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill347February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee333February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager317February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain315February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee324February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould335February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain320February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen297February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee307February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen345February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee284February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen295February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee487February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen357May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee219August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould210August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager217August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee194August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager226August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith214August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould191August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee202August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee188August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain190August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun186August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee179August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg212August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould168August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain172August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen195September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee160September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen169September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain197September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen204September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann178October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee190October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann183October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee273October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain238August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith287April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee301April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith319April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs304April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee333May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert300May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee316May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert404May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould317May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg320February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee315February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen312February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager319April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee307April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager316April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login