Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1220February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould476February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill480February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee455February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager436February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain464February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee479February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould483February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain455February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen413February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee423February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen483February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee427February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen416February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee604February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen475May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee376August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould384August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager353August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee341August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager397August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith353August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould322August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee327August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee319August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain319August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun329August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee309August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg366August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould318August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain344August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen337September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee300September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen299September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain326September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen378September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann413October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee416October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann379October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee517October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain394August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith378April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee407April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith459April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs417April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee482May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert418May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee457May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert523May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould462May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg951February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee439February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen436February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager446April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee429April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager427April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login