Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
avatarOctober 06, 2013 12:31PM
As the Alias parts on the PT has now got the "=" prefix I think we should also talk about the files that are already in our library. I extended LDFind a little bit to get the result to this question. Please have a look at the attached file. It is generated by LDFind.

At present we have 75 files in our library with the qualifier Alias. Should they all be recycled?

If yes, who cares about that?

So we should be quickly up to date with our library in that item I think.
Attachments:
open | download - Alias-parts.txt (5.8 KB)
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee1074February 18, 2012 01:49PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould392February 18, 2012 03:44PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Jude Parrill386February 18, 2012 04:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee373February 19, 2012 07:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager361February 19, 2012 09:04AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain355February 19, 2012 09:58AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee389February 19, 2012 10:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould391February 19, 2012 12:19PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain364February 20, 2012 12:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen330February 21, 2012 03:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee346February 21, 2012 10:37PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen381February 22, 2012 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee345February 22, 2012 10:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen333February 23, 2012 12:14AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee523February 23, 2012 01:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen398May 04, 2012 09:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee279August 03, 2013 11:45PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould273August 04, 2013 12:26AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager252August 04, 2013 09:30AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee234August 04, 2013 09:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager285August 04, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith259August 05, 2013 11:44AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould231August 05, 2013 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee239August 05, 2013 02:11PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee225August 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain228August 09, 2013 12:09AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Rolf Osterthun231August 09, 2013 03:08AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee221August 09, 2013 03:37AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg258August 09, 2013 08:51AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould210August 09, 2013 06:41AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain220August 09, 2013 07:10AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen237September 01, 2013 01:28PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee209September 01, 2013 01:39PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen201September 01, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain240September 01, 2013 11:54PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen257September 03, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Attachments Michael Heidemann241October 06, 2013 12:31PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee262October 06, 2013 12:36PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Michael Heidemann240October 06, 2013 12:42PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee336October 06, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Philippe Hurbain285August 04, 2013 08:03AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith313April 08, 2012 05:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee334April 17, 2012 07:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Allen Smith363April 17, 2012 09:07AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Travis Cobbs342April 17, 2012 09:16AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee386May 10, 2012 03:13AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert342May 10, 2012 09:54AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee357May 10, 2012 01:51PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Roland Melkert437May 10, 2012 02:47PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Tim Gould365May 10, 2012 02:04PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Magnus Forsberg354February 23, 2012 01:50PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee355February 23, 2012 10:17PM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Steffen342February 24, 2012 01:36AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager356April 04, 2012 04:47AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Chris Dee354April 04, 2012 05:34AM
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst Willy Tschager347April 05, 2012 11:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login