Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1
avatarFebruary 16, 2013 10:17AM
Quote
Travis Cobbs
if you add a line to the top of their definition saying "0 Unofficial Part". This will cause LDView to treat the hose as a part, and therefore perform smoothing on it.

Is it ok if this line follows after "0 !LDCAD GENERATED" (but before the bfc one) making it part of the maintained code block. Or does LDView stop processing the header as soon it finds non header metas or something? You could also add it to the template as a workaround in the current version though.

Quote
Travis Cobbs
While doing this, I discovered that your hoses are missing conditional lines between the segments. Adding those would cause the smoothing to look really good (with my LDView fix).

That should be forced by adding those type 5 lines in the donor, only downside is they will cause duplicate lines for all but the last segment. Although I probably be able to add detection for that without too many costly vertex compares. Next Alpha will have a custom donor (with minimal geometry) for hoses I'll make a note to add those lines in those files.

Quote
Travis Cobbs
Another problem is that you split quads into two triangles prior to doing the deformation, and the deformation can result in output where the two triangles that make up the quad have different normals. These triangles should have a conditional line added between them.

So basically I need to add a conditional line between split quad triangles if the angle between their normals is below a certain (0.02 deg or dot prod ?) value?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted
LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Attachments Roland Melkert1214February 15, 2013 06:21PM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Travis Cobbs366February 16, 2013 12:21AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Travis Cobbs335February 16, 2013 12:24AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Philippe Hurbain369February 16, 2013 08:06AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert426February 16, 2013 10:17AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Travis Cobbs356February 16, 2013 07:48PM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Travis Cobbs377February 16, 2013 09:31PM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Philippe Hurbain359February 16, 2013 11:32PM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Travis Cobbs372February 19, 2013 10:06PM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Philippe Hurbain358February 20, 2013 05:25AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert297February 17, 2013 09:41AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Ignacio Fernandez Galvan363February 17, 2013 11:30AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert375February 17, 2013 11:54AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Ignacio Fernandez Galvan481February 19, 2013 06:05AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert372February 19, 2013 12:37PM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Ignacio Fernandez Galvan354February 20, 2013 05:05AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Philippe Hurbain339February 22, 2013 06:48AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert339February 22, 2013 09:49AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Philippe Hurbain296February 22, 2013 10:52AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Ignacio Fernandez Galvan377February 22, 2013 05:37AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert327February 22, 2013 09:55AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Ignacio Fernandez Galvan313February 22, 2013 11:04AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert360February 22, 2013 11:37AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Ignacio Fernandez Galvan344February 23, 2013 12:21AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert288February 23, 2013 10:24AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Ignacio Fernandez Galvan349February 24, 2013 02:35AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert463February 24, 2013 10:29AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Attachments Ignacio Fernandez Galvan381February 24, 2013 11:51AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert405February 24, 2013 02:46PM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Ignacio Fernandez Galvan471February 25, 2013 05:50AM
Re: LDCad 1.2 Public Alpha 1 Roland Melkert507February 25, 2013 03:43PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login