+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: Administrative (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Standards Board (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Change to OMR specs (/thread-18146.html)
Change to OMR specs - Willy Tschager - 2015-11-28
Dear LSB,
Please discuss and vote the change to the Official Model Repository (OMR) Specification Version 1.0.2
Quote:Unofficial parts are allowed to be used, but must be included in the MPD as referenced subfiles. The filename of the unofficial part is subject to the following naming rules:
Thx, w.
Re: Change to OMR specs - Travis Cobbs - 2015-11-29
I agree with adding this requirement. I think it would be better for someone other than myself to come up with the naming restrictions.
Re: Change to OMR specs - Willy Tschager - 2015-11-29
It's all already there: Official Model Repository (OMR) Specification Version 1.0.2
Therefore the whole paragraph would read:
Quote:Unofficial parts are allowed to be used, but must be included in the MPD as referenced subfiles. The filename of the unofficial part is subject to the following naming rules:
<Set Number>[-<Optional Qualifier>] - <Unofficial Part Number>.dat
Where:
<Set Number> is the the number printed on the model's container.
<Optional Qualifier> is a sequential number, starting with 1, added if there is more than one set that could be assigned <Set Number>.
<Unofficial Part Number> is the unofficial part number assigned in that very moment.
Example:
33956.dat would be renamed to 3345 - 33956.dat or 3345-1 - 33956.dat.
It is highly encouraged that any parts created for use in an OMR file be submitted to the LDraw.org Parts Tracker.
If a part is unavailable either officially or on the LDraw.org Parts Tracker, a suitable substitution may be made. If the unavailable part is a patterned part with an unpatterned version available, use the unpatterned version. A comment should be inserted stating that a substitution has been made or, if no substitution is available/suitable, that a piece has been omitted. Reference the step and page number of the instructions if possible.
w.
Re: Change to OMR specs - Roland Melkert - 2015-11-29
I'm ok with this change too, so as far I'm concerned we could vote in this thread to make it definitive asap.